Frederick Verbruggen
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Applied Psychology top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Gordon D. LoganAndré VandierendonckChris ChambersBaptist LiefoogheMichaël StevensAdam R. AronEric‐Jan WagenmakersTrisha Van Zandt
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (85 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers)Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of NeurosciencePsychological Bulletin
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Frederick Verbruggen
131 papers receiving 8.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 151
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.5k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Applied Psychology 1.1k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.0k
Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Verbruggen
This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Verbruggen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Verbruggen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Verbruggen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Verbruggen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Verbruggen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Verbruggen. The network helps show where Frederick Verbruggen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Verbruggen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Verbruggen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Verbruggen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Verbruggen. Frederick Verbruggen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 65 | |
| 18 | 113 | |
| 19 | 181 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Frederick Verbruggen
Frederick Verbruggen is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and Applied Psychology, having authored 136 papers that have together received 8.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (85 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (6.5k citations), General Decision Sciences (600 citations) and Applied Psychology (1.1k citations). Frederick Verbruggen has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gordon D. Logan, André Vandierendonck, Chris Chambers, Baptist Liefooghe, Michaël Stevens, Adam R. Aron, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers, Trisha Van Zandt, Jan De Houwer and Ian P. L. McLaren. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Psychological Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.