Frederick Verbruggen

13.5k total citations · 4 hit papers
136 papers, 8.9k citations indexed

About

Frederick Verbruggen is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick Verbruggen has authored 136 papers receiving a total of 8.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 95 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in Applied Psychology and 21 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Frederick Verbruggen's work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (85 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers). Frederick Verbruggen is often cited by papers focused on Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (85 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (24 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (23 papers). Frederick Verbruggen collaborates with scholars based in Belgium, United Kingdom and United States. Frederick Verbruggen's co-authors include Gordon D. Logan, André Vandierendonck, Chris Chambers, Baptist Liefooghe, Michaël Stevens, Adam R. Aron, Eric‐Jan Wagenmakers, Trisha Van Zandt, Jan De Houwer and Ian P. L. McLaren and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Psychological Bulletin.

In The Last Decade

Frederick Verbruggen

131 papers receiving 8.8k citations

Hit Papers

Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 2014 2008 2010 250 500 750 1000

Peers

Frederick Verbruggen
Nick Yeung United Kingdom
William J. Gehring United States
Tobias Egner United States
Daphna Shohamy United States
Silvia A. Bunge United States
Frederick Verbruggen
Citations per year, relative to Frederick Verbruggen Frederick Verbruggen (= 1×) peers Markus Ullsperger

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick Verbruggen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick Verbruggen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick Verbruggen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick Verbruggen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick Verbruggen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick Verbruggen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick Verbruggen. The network helps show where Frederick Verbruggen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick Verbruggen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick Verbruggen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick Verbruggen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick Verbruggen. Frederick Verbruggen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Troisi, Camille A., et al.. (2026). Unpacking response Inhibition in animals – part 2: an empirical test. Animal Cognition. 29(1). 22–22. 1 indexed citations
2.
Verbruggen, Frederick, et al.. (2025). Don't judge a book by its cover: The effect of perceived facial trustworthiness on advice following in the context of value-based decision-making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 118. 104719–104719.
3.
Müller, Wendt, et al.. (2025). Do ecological valid stop signals aid detour performance? A comparison of four bird species. Royal Society Open Science. 12(6). 250316–250316. 3 indexed citations
4.
Debeer, Dries, An Martel, Wendt Müller, et al.. (2025). Neophobia across social contexts in juvenile herring gulls. Royal Society Open Science. 12(5). 250398–250398. 1 indexed citations
5.
Stienen, Eric, et al.. (2025). Small dietary changes yield growth benefits in Lesser Black-backed Gull chicks.. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints).
6.
Chen, Zhang, et al.. (2024). Differential effects of prior outcomes and pauses on the speed and quality of risky choices. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 37(2). 1 indexed citations
7.
Stienen, Eric, et al.. (2024). Learning on the job? Foraging strategies of juvenile versus adult Lesser black-backed gulls at their first migratory stopover. Royal Society Open Science. 11(12). 241224–241224.
8.
Verbruggen, Frederick, et al.. (2024). Instructing somebody else to act: motor co-representations in the instructor. Royal Society Open Science. 11(1). 230839–230839. 2 indexed citations
9.
Verbruggen, Frederick, et al.. (2023). Proactively Adjusting Stopping: Response Inhibition is Faster when Stopping Occurs Frequently. Journal of Cognition. 6(1). 22–22. 6 indexed citations
10.
Vermeylen, Luc, et al.. (2023). When Response Selection Becomes Gambling: Post-error Slowing and Speeding in Self-paced Colour Discrimination Tasks. Collabra Psychology. 9(1). 5 indexed citations
11.
Baert, Jan M., Eric Stienen, Frederick Verbruggen, et al.. (2021). Resource predictability drives interannual variation in migratory behavior in a long-lived bird. Behavioral Ecology. 33(1). 263–270. 5 indexed citations
12.
Baert, Jan M., Eric Stienen, Frederick Verbruggen, et al.. (2021). Context‐dependent specialisation drives temporal dynamics in intra‐ and inter‐individual variation in foraging behaviour within a generalist bird population. Oikos. 130(8). 1272–1283. 15 indexed citations
13.
Bundt, Carsten, C. Nico Boehler, Frederick Verbruggen, Marcel Braß, & Wim Notebaert. (2020). Reward does not modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipation of a Stroop trial. European Journal of Neuroscience. 53(4). 1019–1028. 5 indexed citations
14.
Jones, Andrew, Laura Baines, Helen K. Ruddock, et al.. (2020). Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 34(7). 783–792. 8 indexed citations
15.
Lea, Stephen E. G., et al.. (2019). Pigeons’ performance in a tracking change-signal procedure is consistent with the independent horse-race model.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Animal Learning and Cognition. 45(4). 464–473. 4 indexed citations
16.
Stevens, Tobias, Damien Brevers, Chris Chambers, et al.. (2015). How does response inhibition influence decision making when gambling?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 21(1). 15–36. 33 indexed citations
17.
Sheldon, Sarah, et al.. (2009). Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representations. Neuropsychologia. 48(2). 541–548. 65 indexed citations
18.
Verbruggen, Frederick, Wim Notebaert, Baptist Liefooghe, & André Vandierendonck. (2006). Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 13(2). 328–333. 113 indexed citations
19.
Stevens, Michaël, Jan Lammertyn, Frederick Verbruggen, & André Vandierendonck. (2006). Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform. Behavior Research Methods. 38(2). 280–286. 181 indexed citations
20.
Liefooghe, Baptist, et al.. (2004). The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetition. Memory. 13(5). 550–560. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026