Tom Roar Eikebrokk

1.1k total citations
49 papers, 731 citations indexed

About

Tom Roar Eikebrokk is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Strategy and Management and Information Systems and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Tom Roar Eikebrokk has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 731 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Management Information Systems, 16 papers in Strategy and Management and 11 papers in Information Systems and Management. Recurrent topics in Tom Roar Eikebrokk's work include Information Technology Governance and Strategy (20 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers). Tom Roar Eikebrokk is often cited by papers focused on Information Technology Governance and Strategy (20 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (12 papers) and Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (11 papers). Tom Roar Eikebrokk collaborates with scholars based in Norway, Finland and Belgium. Tom Roar Eikebrokk's co-authors include Jon Iden, Dag H. Olsen, Øystein Sørebø, Andreas L. Opdahl, Mauricio Marrone, Rune Fensli, Åshild Slettebø, Peter André Busch, Elin Thygesen and Carl Erik Moe and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, Information & Management and International Journal of Information Management.

In The Last Decade

Tom Roar Eikebrokk

45 papers receiving 656 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Tom Roar Eikebrokk Norway 13 295 185 171 146 109 49 731
Sabine Matook Australia 14 214 0.7× 130 0.7× 205 1.2× 202 1.4× 94 0.9× 36 663
Kun Shin Im South Korea 11 235 0.8× 141 0.8× 297 1.7× 139 1.0× 106 1.0× 15 757
Shelly P. J. Wu Taiwan 6 440 1.5× 139 0.8× 134 0.8× 125 0.9× 107 1.0× 9 710
Shih‐Ming Pi Taiwan 11 241 0.8× 227 1.2× 110 0.6× 248 1.7× 88 0.8× 22 690
William Golden Ireland 15 243 0.8× 193 1.0× 287 1.7× 157 1.1× 83 0.8× 49 934
Douglas E. Turner United States 9 308 1.0× 314 1.7× 246 1.4× 221 1.5× 93 0.9× 12 860
Linying Dong Canada 12 300 1.0× 293 1.6× 149 0.9× 141 1.0× 63 0.6× 30 743
Dinesh A. Mirchandani United States 15 381 1.3× 400 2.2× 257 1.5× 170 1.2× 95 0.9× 45 968
Abhay Nath Mishra United States 11 285 1.0× 200 1.1× 281 1.6× 169 1.2× 50 0.5× 28 761
Eric van Heck Netherlands 9 132 0.4× 114 0.6× 166 1.0× 154 1.1× 73 0.7× 23 557

Countries citing papers authored by Tom Roar Eikebrokk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tom Roar Eikebrokk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tom Roar Eikebrokk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tom Roar Eikebrokk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tom Roar Eikebrokk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tom Roar Eikebrokk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tom Roar Eikebrokk. The network helps show where Tom Roar Eikebrokk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tom Roar Eikebrokk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tom Roar Eikebrokk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tom Roar Eikebrokk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tom Roar Eikebrokk. Tom Roar Eikebrokk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Olsen, Dag H., et al.. (2025). Open Innovation Workspaces: Applying the Triple Bottom Line Co-Creation Canvas for the Wine Industry. Procedia Computer Science. 256. 450–457.
2.
Iden, Jon, et al.. (2024). Business process management and digitalization – a reciprocal relationship. Business Process Management Journal. 31(2). 393–415.
3.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, et al.. (2024). Conceptualizing Business Process Management Capabilities in Digitalization Contexts. Procedia Computer Science. 239. 330–337. 1 indexed citations
4.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, et al.. (2024). The Triple Bottom Line Co-creation Canvas. Procedia Computer Science. 239. 322–329. 1 indexed citations
5.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar & Dag H. Olsen. (2020). Towards a Process Theory of IS Business Value Co-creation. Insights from enterprise systems adoption in an SME cluster. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
6.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, et al.. (2018). Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Enabling Employee Co-Creation through Web 2.0. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 6 indexed citations
7.
Thygesen, Elin, et al.. (2018). Barriers to exchanging healthcare information in inter-municipal healthcare services: a qualitative case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 18(1). 92–92. 8 indexed citations
8.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, et al.. (2014). Critical Success Factors for Inter-Organizational Process Collaboration in eHealth. 217–223. 5 indexed citations
9.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, et al.. (2013). Important challenges for coordination and inter-municipal cooperation in health care services: a Delphi study. BMC Health Services Research. 13(1). 451–451. 15 indexed citations
10.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar & Jon Iden. (2012). ITIL Implementation: The Role of ITIL Software and Project Quality. 60–64. 12 indexed citations
11.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, Jon Iden, Dag H. Olsen, & Andreas L. Opdahl. (2011). Understanding the determinants of business process modelling in organisations. Business Process Management Journal. 17(4). 639–662. 20 indexed citations
12.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, Jon Iden, Dag H. Olsen, & Andreas L. Opdahl. (2008). Towards a Model of Process-Modelling Practice: Quantitative Validation and Results. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 12(10). 1608–1619. 5 indexed citations
13.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar, Jon Iden, Dag H. Olsen, & Andreas L. Opdahl. (2008). Exploring Process-Modelling Practice: Towards a Conceptual Model. 8. 376–376. 7 indexed citations
14.
Hu, Qing, et al.. (2007). IT Investment Evaluation as a Socio-Political Process: Determinants to Managerial Adoption and Use. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1007–1018. 2 indexed citations
15.
Iden, Jon, Andreas L. Opdahl, Tom Roar Eikebrokk, & Dag H. Olsen. (2007). What Makes Process Modelling Effective - Modelling or Project Factors?. 72(1). 78–92. 3 indexed citations
16.
Hallikainen, Petri, et al.. (2006). The Use of Formal IT Investment Evaluation Methods in Organizations: A Survey of European Countries. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 67. 8 indexed citations
17.
Hu, Qing, et al.. (2006). IT investment evaluation: why hasn ’t it become an organization routine?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1244–1255. 1 indexed citations
18.
Iden, Jon, Tom Roar Eikebrokk, Dag H. Olsen, & Andreas L. Opdahl. (2006). Process change projects: a study of Norwegian practice. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 189(9). 1671–1682. 4 indexed citations
19.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar & Dag H. Olsen. (2005). Co-opetition and e-Business Success in SMEs: An Empirical Investigation of European SMEs. 162a–162a. 24 indexed citations
20.
Eikebrokk, Tom Roar & Øystein Sørebø. (1999). Technology Acceptance in Situations with Alternative Technologies: An Empirical Evaluation of the Technology Acceptance Model in a Multiple-choice Situation.. European Conference on Information Systems. 129–141. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026