Tina Hurst
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physiology top 2%
- Physical Activity and Health
Papers in
-
- Exercise and Physiological Responses 6
-
- Cardiovascular and exercise physiology 5
- Co-authors
- Peter MurrayAlex V. RowlandsMichael CattRoger EstonDale EsligerB. W. FairleyRobert HurlingJaspreet Singh Sodhi
- Journals
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (6 papers)Journal of Medical Internet Research (3 papers)Clinical Science (1 paper)Journal of Animal Science (1 paper)Journal of Applied Physiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Tina Hurst
16 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Applied Psychology 241
- Physiology 800
- Complementary and alternative medicine 169
- Nutrition and Dietetics 296
- General Health Professions 445
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Hurst
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Hurst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Hurst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Hurst more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Hurst
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Hurst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Hurst. The network helps show where Tina Hurst may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tina Hurst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 8 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 95 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 177 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 11 | |
| 6 | Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer Hit paper breakdown → | 2010 | 478 |
| 7 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 51 | |
| 10 | 2007 | 422 | |
| 11 | 2004 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 176 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 224 | |
| 16 | 2000 | 105 | |
| 17 | 1999 | 31 |
About Tina Hurst
Tina Hurst is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Complementary and alternative medicine, Applied Psychology, Physiology and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (6 papers), Exercise and Physiological Responses (6 papers), Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (5 papers), Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases (4 papers), Fatty Acid Research and Health (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (241 citations), Physiology (800 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (169 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (296 citations) and General Health Professions (445 citations). Tina Hurst has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Murray, Alex V. Rowlands, Michael Catt, Roger Eston, Dale Esliger, B. W. Fairley, Robert Hurling, Jaspreet Singh Sodhi, Marco De Boni and Jonathan R. Powell. Their work appears in journals such as Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Clinical Science, Journal of Animal Science and Journal of Applied Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.