Clinical Science

8.9k papers and 288.9k indexed citations

About

The 8.9k papers published in Clinical Science in the last decades have received a total of 288.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Science usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (2.2k papers), Physiology (1.9k papers) and Molecular Biology (1.9k papers) specifically the topics of Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (596 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (483 papers) and Cardiovascular and exercise physiology (402 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Science are Peter J. Barnes, Simon C. Langley‐Evans, John Doorbar, Jeremy S. Duffield, Michael J. Davies, Philip C. Calder, Nicholas J. Miller, Anthony Milner, Catherine Rice‐Evans and Alan A. Jackson.

In The Last Decade

Clinical Science

8.6k papers receiving 274.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Science more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026