Tina Foster
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Emergency Medical Services top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Greg OgrincLaura MorrisonLinda A. HeadrickPaul B. BataldenRachel ThompsonKyla Z. DonnellyPeter D. MillsMark E. Splaine
- Topics
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers)Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyJournal of General Internal MedicineObstetrics and Gynecology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSweden
In The Last Decade
Tina Foster
37 papers receiving 985 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
- General Health Professions 473
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 434
- Emergency Medical Services 168
- Economics and Econometrics 140
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 131
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Foster
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Foster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Foster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Foster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Foster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Foster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Foster. The network helps show where Tina Foster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Foster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Foster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Foster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Foster. Tina Foster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 67 | |
| 7 | 68 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | Data for benchmarking your OR's performance. | 11 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 321 | |
| 15 | 27 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 146 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Tina Foster
Tina Foster is a scholar working on Health Information Management, General Health Professions and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (5 papers) and Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (87 citations), Health Information Management (118 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (168 citations). Tina Foster has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Greg Ogrinc, Laura Morrison, Linda A. Headrick, Paul B. Batalden, Rachel Thompson, Kyla Z. Donnelly, Peter D. Mills, Mark E. Splaine, Julia Neily and Lloyd Provost. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Journal of General Internal Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.