Obstetrics and Gynecology

16.8k papers and 524.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 16.8k papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology in the last decades have received a total of 524.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology usually cover Obstetrics and Gynecology (6.4k papers), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (5.4k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (4.3k papers) specifically the topics of Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (2.2k papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (1.9k papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (1.8k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Obstetrics and Gynecology are Baha M. Sibai, William M. Callaghan, Cande V. Ananth, Kenneth J. Leveno, Robert Resnik, Marie I. Cedergren, Donald D. McIntire, Cynthia J. Berg, Gynecologists and James B. Spies.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Countries where authors publish in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Obstetrics and Gynecology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Obstetrics and Gynecology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Obstetrics and Gynecology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025