James N. Laditka
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 1%
- Physiology top 2%
- Health top 0.5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Sarah B. LaditkaJanice C. ProbstXuemei SuiJames W. HardinSteven N. BlairMichael J. LaMonteSteven P. HookerZahid Ansari
- Topics
- Health disparities and outcomes (32 papers)Healthcare Policy and Management (25 papers)Global Health Care Issues (20 papers)
- Journals
- JAMAPEDIATRICSStroke
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaIndonesia
In The Last Decade
James N. Laditka
117 papers receiving 3.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- General Health Professions 1.6k
- Economics and Econometrics 814
- Physiology 803
- Health 760
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 686
Countries citing papers authored by James N. Laditka
This map shows the geographic impact of James N. Laditka's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James N. Laditka with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James N. Laditka more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James N. Laditka
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James N. Laditka. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James N. Laditka. The network helps show where James N. Laditka may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James N. Laditka
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James N. Laditka. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James N. Laditka based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James N. Laditka. James N. Laditka is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 13 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 14 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 172 | |
| 8 | 59 | |
| 9 | 161 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 78 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 56 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 27 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 35 | |
| 20 | Semiology, Ideology, "Praxis": Responsible Authority in the Composition Classroom. | 3 |
About James N. Laditka
James N. Laditka is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and General Health Professions, having authored 120 papers that have together received 4.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (32 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (25 papers) and Global Health Care Issues (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (249 citations), Health (760 citations) and General Health Professions (1.6k citations). James N. Laditka has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Sarah B. Laditka, Janice C. Probst, Xuemei Sui, James W. Hardin, Steven N. Blair, Michael J. LaMonte, Steven P. Hooker, Zahid Ansari, Daniela B. Friedman and Bei Wu. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, PEDIATRICS and Stroke.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.