Tina Coldham
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Stephen TeeJudith LathleanLucy SimonsAbigail BurgessTracy Levett‐JonesSophie StaniszewskaLisa DikomitisMoses John Chimbari
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomChileAustralia
In The Last Decade
Tina Coldham
13 papers receiving 299 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- General Health Professions 215
- Education 70
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 62
- Clinical Psychology 60
- Sociology and Political Science 48
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Coldham
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Coldham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Coldham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Coldham more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Coldham
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Coldham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Coldham. The network helps show where Tina Coldham may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Coldham
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Coldham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Coldham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Coldham. Tina Coldham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 99 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 48 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 45 | |
| 12 | An Evaluation of the Impact of the Social Care Modernisation Programme on the Implementation of Direct Payments London | 4 |
| 13 | Students and service users learning together: Co-operative inquiry and its implications for curriculum development | 3 |
About Tina Coldham
Tina Coldham is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Clinical Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (11 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (5 papers) and Health Policy Implementation Science (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (215 citations), Public Administration (18 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (15 citations). Tina Coldham has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Chile and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Tee, Judith Lathlean, Lucy Simons, Abigail Burgess, Tracy Levett‐Jones, Sophie Staniszewska, Lisa Dikomitis, Moses John Chimbari, Rosemary Musesengwa and Gary Hickey. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.