Paul Swift

799 total citations
22 papers, 559 citations indexed

About

Paul Swift is a scholar working on Education, Clinical Psychology and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Paul Swift has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 559 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Education, 8 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Paul Swift's work include Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). Paul Swift is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare innovation and challenges (11 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (6 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers). Paul Swift collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Zambia and United States. Paul Swift's co-authors include Eric Emerson, Chris Hatton, Martín Knapp, Martin Routledge, Barbara McIntosh, Peter Oakes, Emma Krinjen‐Kemp, Renée Romeo, Janet Robertson and J Elliott and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Public Administration and Disability & Society.

In The Last Decade

Paul Swift

19 papers receiving 513 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Paul Swift United Kingdom 10 198 161 134 99 63 22 559
Martin Routledge United Kingdom 8 159 0.8× 163 1.0× 119 0.9× 89 0.9× 59 0.9× 12 507
Emma Krinjen‐Kemp United Kingdom 6 142 0.7× 129 0.8× 103 0.8× 82 0.8× 59 0.9× 9 460
Fiona Keogh Ireland 14 114 0.6× 119 0.7× 211 1.6× 108 1.1× 112 1.8× 50 541
John Dow United Kingdom 7 185 0.9× 62 0.4× 201 1.5× 113 1.1× 61 1.0× 18 483
Fintan Sheerin Ireland 15 180 0.9× 102 0.6× 246 1.8× 138 1.4× 23 0.4× 60 786
Anja Heilmann United Kingdom 15 198 1.0× 65 0.4× 291 2.2× 128 1.3× 25 0.4× 43 871
Carol Simons United States 14 111 0.6× 52 0.3× 194 1.4× 74 0.7× 33 0.5× 31 628
Phillip Beatty United States 10 81 0.4× 48 0.3× 214 1.6× 84 0.8× 90 1.4× 17 657
Jean Hunleth United States 15 76 0.4× 139 0.9× 217 1.6× 94 0.9× 40 0.6× 57 798
Rachael Carroll Ireland 11 79 0.4× 51 0.3× 54 0.4× 202 2.0× 55 0.9× 32 499

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Swift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Swift's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Swift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Swift more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Swift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Swift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Swift. The network helps show where Paul Swift may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Swift

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Swift. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Swift based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Swift. Paul Swift is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Davey, Vanessa, José‐Luis Fernández, Martín Knapp, et al.. (2021). Direct payments: a national survey of direct payments policy and practice. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 4 indexed citations
2.
Davey, Vanessa, Tom Snell, José‐Luis Fernández, et al.. (2021). Schemes providing support to people using direct payments: a UK survey. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
3.
Williams, Val, Paul Swift, & Victoria Mason. (2015). The blurred edges of intellectual disability. Disability & Society. 30(5). 704–716. 7 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Val, Geraldine Boyle, Marcus Jepson, et al.. (2013). Best interests decisions: professional practices in health and social care. Health & Social Care in the Community. 22(1). 78–86. 20 indexed citations
5.
Swift, Paul, et al.. (2013). What happens when people with learning disabilities need advice about the law. Explore Bristol Research. 9 indexed citations
6.
Williams, Val, Geraldine Boyle, Marcus Jepson, et al.. (2012). Making Best Interests Decisions: People and Processes. Open Research Online (The Open University). 17 indexed citations
7.
Williamson, Toby, Geraldine Boyle, Pauline Heslop, et al.. (2012). Listening to the lady in the bed:The Mental Capacity Act 2005 in practice for older people. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 2 indexed citations
8.
Emerson, Eric, Chris Hatton, Richard P. Hastings, et al.. (2011). The health of people with autistic spectrum disorders. Tizard Learning Disability Review. 16(4). 36–44. 4 indexed citations
9.
Robertson, Janet, Eric Emerson, Chris Hatton, et al.. (2008). Analisis longitudinal del impacto y coste de la planificacion centrada en la persona para personas con discapacidad intelectual en inglaterra.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 39(225). 5–30. 2 indexed citations
10.
Wigham, Sarah, Janet Robertson, Eric Emerson, et al.. (2008). Reported goal setting and benefits of person centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities. 12(2). 143–152. 20 indexed citations
11.
Swift, Paul. (2007). The History and Mystery of Diogenes Laertius. 8(1). 1 indexed citations
12.
Robertson, Janet, Chris Hatton, Eric Emerson, et al.. (2007). Reported Barriers to the Implementation of Person‐Centred Planning for People with Intellectual Disabilities in the UK. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities. 20(4). 297–307. 35 indexed citations
13.
Robertson, Janet, Eric Emerson, Chris Hatton, et al.. (2006). Longitudinal Analysis of the Impact and Cost of Person-Centered Planning for People With Intellectual Disabilities in England. American Journal on Mental Retardation. 111(6). 400–400. 45 indexed citations
14.
Robertson, Janet, Eric Emerson, Chris Hatton, et al.. (2006). Person‐centred planning: factors associated with successful outcomes for people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 51(3). 232–243. 68 indexed citations
15.
Swift, Paul. (2006). Implementing direct payments for people with a learning disability. Housing Care and Support. 9(4). 23–26. 1 indexed citations
16.
Swift, Paul, et al.. (2006). An Evaluation of the Impact of the Social Care Modernisation Programme on the Implementation of Direct Payments London. CLOK (University of Central Lancashire). 4 indexed citations
17.
Romeo, Renée, Martín Knapp, Barbara McIntosh, et al.. (2006). Unit Costs of Health and Social Care 2006. 228 indexed citations
18.
Swift, Paul. (2005). Becoming Nietzsche: Early Reflections on Democritus, Schopenhauer, and Kant. 9 indexed citations
19.
Robertson, Janet, Eric Emerson, Chris Hatton, et al.. (2005). The impact of person centred planning.. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 58 indexed citations
20.
Morgan, Rod & Paul Swift. (1987). THE FUTURE OF POLICE AUTHORITIES: MEMBERS VIEWS. Public Administration. 65(3). 259–276. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026