Sarah Carr

4.6k citations
65 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Sarah Carr

60 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Sarah Carr
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Public Administration 68
  • General Health Professions 474
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 104
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 150
  • Clinical Psychology 181
Replace Jeffrey R. Lacasse with:
Jeffrey R. Lacasse United States
Lisa Cosgrove United States
David Barrett United Kingdom
Gerald J. Stahler United States
Joel T. Braslow United States
David Prosser United Kingdom
Gary R. VandenBos United States
Alan O’Rourke United Kingdom
Edward J. Mullen United States
Susan Bauer‐Wu United States
Sarah Carr relative to Jeffrey R. Lacasse United States Jeffrey R. Lacasse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Jeffrey R. Lacasse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Carr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Carr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Carr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Carr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Carr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Carr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Carr. The network helps show where Sarah Carr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Sarah Carr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sarah Carr Line = papers co-authored together Sarah Carr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2016212
2 200798
3 201073
4 201853
5 202052
6 201445
7 201439
8 201939
9 201836
10 201134
11 202132
12 201029
13 200828
14 201126
15 201925
16 201921
17
Values and methodologies for social research in mental health
200621
18 201916
19 201915
20 201615

About Sarah Carr

Sarah Carr is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (26 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (25 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (7 papers), LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (7 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (6 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (6 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (6 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (68 citations), General Health Professions (474 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (104 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (150 citations) and Clinical Psychology (181 citations). Sarah Carr has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca J. Williams, Tony Tse, Deborah A. Zarin, Gregory A. Jicha, Nicky Lambert, Peter Beresford, Diana Rose, Helen Spandler, Martin Webber and Samantha Treacy. Their work appears in journals such as Disability & Society, Journal of Mental Health, Health Expectations, Reading and Writing and Feminism & Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact