Helen Spandler
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Conservation top 0.2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jo ShentonLyn KentSue HackingJenny SeckerMick McKeownTheodore StickleyAlastair RoyAngela Woods
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (20 papers)Healthcare innovation and challenges (12 papers)Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Helen Spandler
51 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- General Health Professions 599
- Clinical Psychology 391
- Social Psychology 335
- Conservation 321
- Sociology and Political Science 309
Countries citing papers authored by Helen Spandler
This map shows the geographic impact of Helen Spandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Helen Spandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Helen Spandler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Helen Spandler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Helen Spandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Helen Spandler. The network helps show where Helen Spandler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Helen Spandler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Helen Spandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Helen Spandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Helen Spandler. Helen Spandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | Who is included in the Mad Studies Project | 15 |
| 5 | 30 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | FOLLOW-UP EVALUATION OF SELF-DIRECTED SUPPORT TEST SITES IN SCOTLAND | 7 |
| 8 | 94 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 105 | |
| 12 | Beyond Fear and Control: Working with Young People Who Self Harm | 10 |
| 13 | 74 | |
| 14 | 103 | |
| 15 | Mental health, social inclusion and arts: developing the evidence base | 50 |
| 16 | Individualised Funding, Social Inclusion and the Politics of Mental Health | 3 |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | Who's Hurting Who? Young People, Self-Harm and Suicide | 45 |
| 20 | 17 |
About Helen Spandler
Helen Spandler is a scholar working on Conservation, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (20 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (12 papers) and Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (321 citations), General Health Professions (599 citations) and Clinical Psychology (391 citations). Helen Spandler has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jo Shenton, Lyn Kent, Sue Hacking, Jenny Secker, Mick McKeown, Theodore Stickley, Alastair Roy, Angela Woods, J. Secker and Julie Brownlie. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology and The Lancet Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.