Thomas E. Piemme

480 citations
25 papers · 370 indexed · h-index 11

Thomas E. Piemme

23 papers receiving 300 citations

Peers

Thomas E. Piemme
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Family Practice 35
  • Internal Medicine 25
  • Health Information Management 14
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 69
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
Replace Hangwi Tang with:
Hangwi Tang Australia
Pasha Normahani United Kingdom
Christopher R. Stephenson United States
Brendan S. Kelly Ireland
Shawn Khan Canada
Aashish Rajesh United States
Mohammad Reza Dehghani Iran
Matthew J. Czarny United States
Ashok Handa United Kingdom
Pierre Elias United States
Thomas E. Piemme relative to Hangwi Tang Australia Hangwi Tang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Hangwi Tang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas E. Piemme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas E. Piemme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas E. Piemme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas E. Piemme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas E. Piemme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas E. Piemme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas E. Piemme. The network helps show where Thomas E. Piemme may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas E. Piemme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas E. Piemme Line = papers co-authored together Thomas E. Piemme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20211
2 20171
3 20171
4 199718
5 19942
6 199311
7
PC CLIN-SIM: a toolbook based clinical simulation environment.
19921
8
Medical Informatics in the Curriculum at the George Washington University
19902
9 1988112
10 19850
11 19772
12 197412
13 19731
14 19711
15 196523
16 19656
17 196434
18 196416
19 196328
20 196313

About Thomas E. Piemme

Thomas E. Piemme is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services, General Health Professions, Internal Medicine and Health Information Management, having authored 25 papers that have together received 370 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (4 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (35 citations), Internal Medicine (25 citations), Health Information Management (14 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (69 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (88 citations). Thomas E. Piemme has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Steven A. Schroeder, John W. Hyland, G. Teeling Smith, Lewis Dexter, Roe E. Wells, Florence W. Haynes, Stefan Schroeder, Sidney Alexander, L Dexter and Michael McCally. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, The Journal of Physician Assistant Education, JAMA, American Heart Journal and Annals of Internal Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026