Stuart Hepplestone

554 total citations
10 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Stuart Hepplestone is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Stuart Hepplestone has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Education, 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 0 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Stuart Hepplestone's work include Student Assessment and Feedback (9 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (7 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers). Stuart Hepplestone is often cited by papers focused on Student Assessment and Feedback (9 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (7 papers) and Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers). Stuart Hepplestone collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Stuart Hepplestone's co-authors include Brian Irwin, Helen Parkin, Louise Thorpe, Ian Glover and Helen Rodger and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Educational Technology, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Innovations in Education and Teaching International.

In The Last Decade

Stuart Hepplestone

10 papers receiving 326 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stuart Hepplestone United Kingdom 8 291 66 45 45 22 10 360
Helen Parkin United Kingdom 7 245 0.8× 59 0.9× 45 1.0× 43 1.0× 26 1.2× 13 323
Louise Thorpe United Kingdom 6 235 0.8× 49 0.7× 34 0.8× 43 1.0× 31 1.4× 8 291
Kristine Ludvigsen Norway 8 278 1.0× 81 1.2× 36 0.8× 54 1.2× 22 1.0× 10 367
Pamela D. Sherer United States 5 181 0.6× 53 0.8× 31 0.7× 38 0.8× 33 1.5× 7 245
Bryn Holmes Ireland 6 187 0.6× 70 1.1× 80 1.8× 52 1.2× 29 1.3× 15 315
Tony Herrington Australia 4 267 0.9× 56 0.8× 33 0.7× 43 1.0× 21 1.0× 9 335
Rebeca Soler Spain 4 283 1.0× 37 0.6× 34 0.8× 46 1.0× 6 0.3× 6 359
Judith V. Boettcher United States 8 217 0.7× 67 1.0× 61 1.4× 61 1.4× 19 0.9× 22 315
Reem Alebaikan Saudi Arabia 7 229 0.8× 54 0.8× 82 1.8× 71 1.6× 32 1.5× 11 322
Peter W Kilgour Australia 9 233 0.8× 44 0.7× 33 0.7× 20 0.4× 20 0.9× 39 299

Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Hepplestone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Hepplestone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Hepplestone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Hepplestone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Hepplestone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Hepplestone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Hepplestone. The network helps show where Stuart Hepplestone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stuart Hepplestone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stuart Hepplestone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stuart Hepplestone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stuart Hepplestone. Stuart Hepplestone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Hepplestone, Stuart, Ian Glover, Brian Irwin, & Helen Parkin. (2016). Setting out the Role of Feedback in the Assessment Process through Both the Student and Tutor Perspective.. SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University). 10(1). 81–90. 3 indexed citations
2.
Hepplestone, Stuart. (2016). Exploring the processes used by students to apply feedback. 5(1). 2 indexed citations
3.
Glover, Ian, Stuart Hepplestone, Helen Parkin, Helen Rodger, & Brian Irwin. (2016). Pedagogy first: Realising technology enhanced learning by focusing on teaching practice. British Journal of Educational Technology. 47(5). 993–1002. 43 indexed citations
4.
Glover, Ian, Helen Parkin, Stuart Hepplestone, Brian Irwin, & Helen Rodger. (2015). Making connections: technological interventions to support students in using, and tutors in creating, assessment feedback. Research in Learning Technology. 23(1). 27078–27078. 8 indexed citations
5.
Hepplestone, Stuart, et al.. (2014). Understanding how students process and use feedback to support their learning. Insight (University of Cumbria). 8(1). 41–53. 17 indexed citations
6.
Irwin, Brian, et al.. (2012). Engaging students with feedback through adaptive release. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 50(1). 51–61. 16 indexed citations
7.
Irwin, Brian & Stuart Hepplestone. (2011). Examining increased flexibility in assessment formats. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 37(7). 773–785. 34 indexed citations
8.
Parkin, Helen, et al.. (2011). A role for technology in enhancing students’ engagement with feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 37(8). 963–973. 71 indexed citations
9.
Hepplestone, Stuart, et al.. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology. 19(2). 117–127. 48 indexed citations
10.
Hepplestone, Stuart, et al.. (2011). Using technology to encourage student engagement with feedback: a literature review. Research in Learning Technology. 19(2). 118 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026