Philosophy and literature

897 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 897 papers published in Philosophy and literature in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophy and literature usually cover Philosophy (388 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (265 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (112 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (119 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (53 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophy and literature are Arthur C. Danto, Martha C. Nussbaum, Richard A. Posner, Brian Boyd, Joseph Carroll, Alan D. Sokal, Denis Dutton, Steven Pinker, Michelle Scalise Sugiyama and Berys Gaut.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophy and literature

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophy and literature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophy and literature.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophy and literature

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophy and literature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophy and literature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophy and literature more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025