Sterling M. McMurrin

783 citations
29 papers · 146 indexed · h-index 7

Sterling M. McMurrin

16 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers

Sterling M. McMurrin
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • History 41
  • General Psychology 4
  • Philosophy 19
  • Health 13
  • Religious studies 7
Replace John M. Mulder with:
John M. Mulder United States
Donald Meyer United States
Will Durant
Norman Fiering United States
Richard Marius United States
Gore Vidal United States
Howard M. Sachar United States
Robert Muchembled France
R. W. B. Lewis
Stephen B. Oates United States
Sterling M. McMurrin relative to John M. Mulder United States John M. Mulder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
John M. Mulder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sterling M. McMurrin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sterling M. McMurrin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sterling M. McMurrin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sterling M. McMurrin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sterling M. McMurrin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sterling M. McMurrin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sterling M. McMurrin. The network helps show where Sterling M. McMurrin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Sterling M. McMurrin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sterling M. McMurrin Line = papers co-authored together Sterling M. McMurrin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 199638
3 19920
4 19891
5
Liberty, Equality, and Law: Selected Tanner Lectures on Moral Philosophy
198722
6
The Antinomies of Higher Education.
19791
7
The psychological and ethical aspects of Mormon group life . The religious thought of E.E. Ericksen : introductory essay
19750
8 19740
9 19745
10 19732
11
Resources for urban schools : better use and balance
19712
12
Commission on Instructional Technology.
19698
13 19682
14
The Theological Foundations of the Mormon Religion
19657
15 19624
16 19612
17 19572
18 19562
19 19559
20
Contemporary philosophy : a book of readings
19541

About Sterling M. McMurrin

Sterling M. McMurrin is a scholar working on Religious studies, History and Philosophy, having authored 29 papers that have together received 146 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mormonism, Religion, and History (6 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (2 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (2 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (1 paper) and Religious Education and Schools (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History (41 citations), General Psychology (4 citations) and Philosophy (19 citations). Sterling M. McMurrin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Irwin Altman, Joseph Ginat, J.M. Rawls, Ilya Prigogine, James L. Jarrett, Frederick C. Dommeyer, John Harp, Eric Ashby, Ralph W. Tyler and Henry M. Levin. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Monist, The Journal of Philosophy and Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026