The Monist

1.7k papers and 15.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Monist in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations. Papers published in The Monist usually cover Philosophy (609 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (288 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (246 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy and Theoretical Science (234 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (144 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (135 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Monist are Brand Blanshard, Judith Jarvis Thomson, John McDowell, Joël Feinberg, Gerald Dworkin, John O’Neill, Mary Anne Warren, Herbert Morris, William P. Alston and John Campbell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Monist

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Monist. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Monist.

Countries where authors publish in The Monist

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Monist. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Monist with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Monist more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025