Frederick C. Dommeyer

468 citations
12 papers · 53 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

Frederick C. Dommeyer

9 papers receiving 37 citations

Peers

Frederick C. Dommeyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 50
  • Archeology 4
  • Library and Information Sciences 2
  • History and Philosophy of Science 5
  • Philosophy 7
  • General Decision Sciences 1
Replace Arthur Ε. Murphy with:
Arthur Ε. Murphy United States
Franz Borkenau
Edward Bullough
B. L. Ullman United States
Anna Balakian United States
David Rosand United States
Lily B. Campbell United States
A. Cornelius Benjamin United States
E. M. W. Tillyard
Ernst Kapp Oman
Frederick C. Dommeyer relative to Arthur Ε. Murphy United States Arthur Ε. Murphy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Arthur Ε. Murphy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick C. Dommeyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick C. Dommeyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick C. Dommeyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick C. Dommeyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick C. Dommeyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick C. Dommeyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick C. Dommeyer. The network helps show where Frederick C. Dommeyer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Frederick C. Dommeyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Frederick C. Dommeyer Line = papers co-authored together Frederick C. Dommeyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 195312
2 196911
3 19559
4 19615
5 19585
6 19654
7 19573
8 19672
9 19601
10 19591
11 19660
12
Idea Men Of Today
20180

About Frederick C. Dommeyer

Frederick C. Dommeyer is a scholar working on Social Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Atmospheric Science and General Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 53 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (1 paper), History and Theory of Mathematics (1 paper), Education and Critical Thinking Development (1 paper), Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution (1 paper), Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies (1 paper), Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications (1 paper) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Archeology (4 citations), Library and Information Sciences (2 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (5 citations), Philosophy (7 citations) and General Decision Sciences (1 citation). Frederick C. Dommeyer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include P. J. van Heerden, W. T. Jones, Sterling M. McMurrin, Sidney Hook, James L. Jarrett, Philip P. Hallie, Edward H. Madden, Iredell Jenkins and Louis O. Kattsoff. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Journal of Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact