Stephen F. Duncan

886 citations
47 papers · 552 indexed · h-index 15

Stephen F. Duncan

40 papers receiving 463 citations

Peers

Stephen F. Duncan
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Demography 194
  • Social Psychology 248
  • Clinical Psychology 153
  • Applied Psychology 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 240
Replace Brian J. Higginbotham with:
Brian J. Higginbotham United States
Boris Mayer Switzerland
Yoram Bilu Israel
Daniel H. Mansson United States
Kate J. Diebels United States
Nuran Hortaçsu Türkiye
Anand C. Paranjpe Canada
Monica A. Payne Barbados
Anne van Hoof Netherlands
Karen J. Prager United States
Stephen F. Duncan relative to Brian J. Higginbotham United States Brian J. Higginbotham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Brian J. Higginbotham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen F. Duncan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen F. Duncan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen F. Duncan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen F. Duncan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen F. Duncan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen F. Duncan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen F. Duncan. The network helps show where Stephen F. Duncan may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Stephen F. Duncan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Stephen F. Duncan Line = papers co-authored together Stephen F. Duncan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20244
2 20226
3 202215
4 202118
5
The Case for Marriage Preparation
20181
6 20181
7 20176
8 20161
9 201311
10 201225
11 201117
12 200930
13 20091
14
Using Focus Groups to Identify Rural Participant Needs in Balancing Work and Family Education.
199913
15
Promoting Programs in Aging through Interdisciplinary Collaboration.
19966
16 199625
17
Book Reviews -- Putting Families First: America's Family Support Movement and the Challenge of Change Edited by Sharon L. Kagan and Bernice Weissbourd
19951
18 199112
19 19916
20 19909

About Stephen F. Duncan

Stephen F. Duncan is a scholar working on Demography, Social Psychology and Gender Studies, having authored 47 papers that have together received 552 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Dynamics and Relationships (17 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (15 papers), Marriage and Sexual Relationships (7 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (6 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (5 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (194 citations), Social Psychology (248 citations) and Clinical Psychology (153 citations). Stephen F. Duncan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include William F. Hodges, Sharon Lynn Kagan, Jeffry H. Larson, James A. Ainge, Chongming Yang, Thomas B. Holman, Benjamin Silliman, Alan J. Hawkins, Tim Dunnagan and Lynn Paul. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Current Biology and Journal of Neurochemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026