Journal of Neurochemistry

27.8k papers and 1.3M indexed citations i.

About

The 27.8k papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry in the last decades have received a total of 1.3M indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry usually cover Molecular Biology (16.0k papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (13.4k papers) and Physiology (5.1k papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8.6k papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3.3k papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (2.3k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Neurochemistry are Frode Fonnum, Barry Halliwell, Leslie L. Iversen, Jacques Glowinski, Lars Svennerholm, Mark P. Mattson, Arne Schousboe, Graham A.R. Johnston, William M. Pardridge and William T. Norton.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Neurochemistry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Neurochemistry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Neurochemistry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Neurochemistry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025