Countries citing papers authored by Daniel P. Ames
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel P. Ames's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel P. Ames with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel P. Ames more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel P. Ames. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel P. Ames. The network helps show where Daniel P. Ames may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel P. Ames
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel P. Ames.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel P. Ames based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel P. Ames. Daniel P. Ames is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2021). Hydroviewer: A Web Application to Localize Global Hydrologic Forecasts. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 7(1). 9.9 indexed citations
8.
Voinov, Alexey, Daniel P. Ames, Albert J. Kettner, et al.. (2020). Open web-distributed integrated geographic modelling and simulation to enable broader participation and applications (Position paper). EPrints - HR Wallingford (HR Wallingford).1 indexed citations
Nelson, James A., et al.. (2019). Global Water Sustainability Tools from Earth Observations for the Americas. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2019.1 indexed citations
11.
Tarboton, David G., Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Daniel P. Ames, et al.. (2017). HydroShare: A Platform for Collaborative Data and Model Sharing in Hydrology. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 2017. 9834.1 indexed citations
12.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2017). HydroShare GIS: Visualizing Spatial Data in the Cloud. Utah State Research and Scholarship (Utah State University). 4(1). 2.7 indexed citations
13.
Stealey, Michael, et al.. (2017). Open Water Data Solutions for Accessing the National Water Model. 4(1). 3.9 indexed citations
14.
Nelson, Jake R., Daniel P. Ames, & D. L. Blodgett. (2017). Open Hydrology Courseware Using the United States Geological Survey’s National Water Census Data Portal. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 5(1). 1–14.1 indexed citations
15.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2016). An Extensible, Modular Architecture Coupling HydroShare and Tethys Platform to Deploy Water Science Web Apps. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016.1 indexed citations
16.
Tarboton, David G., Jeffery S. Horsburgh, Daniel P. Ames, et al.. (2015). Advancing Collaboration through Hydrologic Data and Model Sharing. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University). 2015.1 indexed citations
17.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2014). Design of a High Resolution Open Access Global Snow Cover Web Map Service Using Ground and Satellite Observations. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014.1 indexed citations
18.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2011). A Method for Extracting Stream Channel Flow Paths from LiDAR Point Cloud Data. 11(1).2 indexed citations
19.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2011). Spatiotemporal analysis of stream network structure based on snow-on and snow-off LiDAR. AGUFM. 2011.2 indexed citations
20.
Ames, Daniel P., et al.. (2010). Effects of LiDAR Derived DEM Resolution on Hydrographic Feature Extraction. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2010.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.