Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie van Hover
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie van Hover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie van Hover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie van Hover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie van Hover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie van Hover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie van Hover. The network helps show where Stephanie van Hover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie van Hover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie van Hover.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie van Hover based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie van Hover. Stephanie van Hover is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hicks, David, et al.. (2020). Shifting the Gaze: (Mis)Using Actor-Network-Theory to Examine Preservice Teachers’ Uses of Digital Technologies.. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 20(4). 730–742.
4.
Hover, Stephanie van, et al.. (2020). Utilizing Home Visiting to Support Differentiated Instruction in an Elementary Classroom.. The School community journal/School community journal. 30(1). 107–137.2 indexed citations
5.
Stoddard, Jeremy, et al.. (2019). Reading, Analyzing, and Creating Informational Graphics in the Elementary Classroom.. Social studies and the young learner. 31(4). 15–18.3 indexed citations
6.
Hover, Stephanie van, et al.. (2019). Culture "Calle": Celebrating Heritage, Diversity, and Dreams in Bilingual Classrooms.. Social studies and the young learner. 32(1). 15–19.
Hicks, David, et al.. (2016). Toward a Useable Protocol for Identifying and Evaluating Classroom Ready Online Educational Resources for Social Studies. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2016(1). 2709–2721.2 indexed citations
9.
Hicks, David, et al.. (2016). Junior Detectives: Teaching with Primary Sources as a Bridge to Disciplinary Literacy.. Social studies and the young learner. 29(1). 9–15.3 indexed citations
Hover, Stephanie van, et al.. (2014). Revisiting the "Sleeping Giant" Metaphor: Is It Still Sleeping in the Commonwealth of Virginia, and Is It Still Really a Giant?. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education. 14(2). 141–157.3 indexed citations
Hover, Stephanie van, et al.. (2005). Whole-Class Inquiry: Social Studies.. Learning and leading with technology. 32(8). 49–51.3 indexed citations
18.
Hover, Stephanie van, Kathy Swan, & Michael J. Berson. (2004). Digital Images in the History Classroom. In the Curriculum--Social Studies.. Learning and leading with technology. 31(8). 22–25.7 indexed citations
19.
Garofalo, Joe, Glen Bull, Randy L. Bell, & Stephanie van Hover. (2003). Interactive Whole-Class Display Systems.. Learning and leading with technology. 32(2). 28–31.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.