This map shows the geographic impact of Sid Bourke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sid Bourke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sid Bourke more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sid Bourke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sid Bourke. The network helps show where Sid Bourke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sid Bourke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sid Bourke.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sid Bourke based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sid Bourke. Sid Bourke is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lovat, Terence, et al.. (2015). Examining doctoral examination and the question of the Viva. UNSWorks (UNSW Sydney). 47(3). 5–23.18 indexed citations
Dunphy, Bruce C., et al.. (2010). Evidence based-practice and affect : the impact of physician attitudes on outcomes associated with clinical reasoning and decision-making. 10. 56–64.2 indexed citations
8.
Holbrook, Allyson, et al.. (2009). A profile of education journals. NOVA (University of Newcastle, Australia).6 indexed citations
9.
Bourke, Sid, Allyson Holbrook, & Terence Lovat. (2007). Relationships of PhD candidate, candidature and examination characteristics with thesis outcomes. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).8 indexed citations
10.
Holbrook, Allyson, Sid Bourke, Terence Lovat, & Kerry Dally. (2005). An investigation of inconsistencies in PhD examination decisions. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).4 indexed citations
11.
Bourke, Sid, Allyson Holbrook, Terence Lovat, & Kerry Dally. (2004). Characteristics, degree completion times and thesis quality of Australian PhD candidates. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).4 indexed citations
12.
Bourke, Sid, et al.. (2004). Attrition, completion and completion times of PhD candidates. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).42 indexed citations
13.
Holbrook, Allyson & Sid Bourke. (2004). An Investigation of PhD Examination Outcome in Australia Using a Mixed Method Approach.. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 4. 153–169.11 indexed citations
14.
Leonard, Carl, Sid Bourke, & Neville Schofield. (2004). Affecting the Affective: Affective Outcomes in the Context of School Effectiveness, School Improvement and Quality Schools.. Issues in educational research. 14(1). 1–28.10 indexed citations
15.
Holbrook, Allyson, Sid Bourke, Terence Lovat, & Kerry Dally. (2004). Qualities and Characteristics in the Written Reports of Doctoral Thesis Examiners. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia). 4. 126–145.24 indexed citations
Lovat, Terence, et al.. (2002). Examiner comment on theses that have been revised and resubmitted. NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia).2 indexed citations
18.
Ainley, John, et al.. (2000). Mapping educational research and its impact on Australian schools.22 indexed citations
19.
Ainley, John & Sid Bourke. (1992). Students' views of primary school. Research Papers in Education. 7(2).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.