Shigeto Uchiyama
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 1%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tomomi UenoYasuhiro AbiruYoshiko IshimiJian WuToshiya TodaJun OkaHaretsugu HishigakiYoshikazu Shimada
- Topics
- Phytoestrogen effects and research (33 papers)Food composition and properties (8 papers)Food Quality and Safety Studies (7 papers)
In The Last Decade
Shigeto Uchiyama
38 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 882
- Nutrition and Dietetics 332
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 323
- Molecular Biology 300
- Genetics 249
Countries citing papers authored by Shigeto Uchiyama
This map shows the geographic impact of Shigeto Uchiyama's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shigeto Uchiyama with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shigeto Uchiyama more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shigeto Uchiyama
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shigeto Uchiyama. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shigeto Uchiyama. The network helps show where Shigeto Uchiyama may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shigeto Uchiyama
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shigeto Uchiyama. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shigeto Uchiyama based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shigeto Uchiyama. Shigeto Uchiyama is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 94 | |
| 13 | 40 | |
| 14 | 46 | |
| 15 | 34 | |
| 16 | 27 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 96 | |
| 20 | Arthrographis cuboidea isolated as a causal fungus from diseased wood logs for cultivation of shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes) | 3 |
About Shigeto Uchiyama
Shigeto Uchiyama is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytoestrogen effects and research (33 papers), Food composition and properties (8 papers) and Food Quality and Safety Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (882 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (332 citations) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (323 citations). Shigeto Uchiyama has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, Spain and China. Frequent co-authors include Tomomi Ueno, Yasuhiro Abiru, Yoshiko Ishimi, Jian Wu, Toshiya Toda, Jun Oka, Haretsugu Hishigaki, Yoshikazu Shimada, Masayuki Takahashi and Junko Ezaki. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Applied and Environmental Microbiology and Journal of Bone and Mineral Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.