Shelley Witt
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.1%
- Sensory Systems top 0.2%
- Signal Processing top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard S. TylerKate GfellerCamille C. DunnJohn F. KnutsonGeorge WoodworthMaureen MehrWilliam NobleJulie Stordahl
- Topics
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (35 papers)Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (21 papers)Noise Effects and Management (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Shelley Witt
40 papers receiving 2.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Speech and Hearing 1.3k
- Sensory Systems 1.0k
- Signal Processing 494
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 264
Countries citing papers authored by Shelley Witt
This map shows the geographic impact of Shelley Witt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Shelley Witt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Shelley Witt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Shelley Witt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Shelley Witt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Shelley Witt. The network helps show where Shelley Witt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Shelley Witt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Shelley Witt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Shelley Witt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Shelley Witt. Shelley Witt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 106 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 35 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 67 | |
| 8 | 51 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 93 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 115 | |
| 14 | 188 | |
| 15 | 167 | |
| 16 | 131 | |
| 17 | Musical Involvement and Enjoyment of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants. | 37 |
| 18 | 13 | |
| 19 | 21 | |
| 20 | Effects of implementing EPA's endangered species protection program on national forest system lands | 0 |
About Shelley Witt
Shelley Witt is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 41 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (35 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (21 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (1.0k citations), Speech and Hearing (1.3k citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations). Shelley Witt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Richard S. Tyler, Kate Gfeller, Camille C. Dunn, John F. Knutson, George Woodworth, Maureen Mehr, William Noble, Julie Stordahl, John P. Preece and Aaron M. Christ. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Ear and Hearing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.