Kate Gfeller

4.8k total citations
84 papers, 3.7k citations indexed

About

Kate Gfeller is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Gfeller has authored 84 papers receiving a total of 3.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 66 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 30 papers in Speech and Hearing and 21 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kate Gfeller's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (58 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (35 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (30 papers). Kate Gfeller is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (58 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (35 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (30 papers). Kate Gfeller collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Kate Gfeller's co-authors include Christopher W. Turner, Bruce J. Gantz, Shelley Witt, John F. Knutson, Virginia Driscoll, Jacob Oleson, Carol Olszewski, Mary W. Lowder, Charissa R. Lansing and George Woodworth and has published in prestigious journals such as The Laryngoscope, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Frontiers in Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Kate Gfeller

79 papers receiving 3.5k citations

Peers

Kate Gfeller
John J. Galvin United States
Kelly L. Tremblay United States
Curtis W. Ponton United States
Anu Sharma United States
Samira Anderson United States
Suzanne C. Purdy New Zealand
Trent Nicol United States
Larry E. Humes United States
John J. Galvin United States
Kate Gfeller
Citations per year, relative to Kate Gfeller Kate Gfeller (= 1×) peers John J. Galvin

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Gfeller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Gfeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Gfeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Gfeller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Gfeller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Gfeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Gfeller. The network helps show where Kate Gfeller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Gfeller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Gfeller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Gfeller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Gfeller. Kate Gfeller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2023). Psychosocial and auditory factors that influence successful music-based auditory training in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 17. 1308712–1308712.
2.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2019). Practices and Attitudes That Enhance Music Engagement of Adult Cochlear Implant Users. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13. 1368–1368. 10 indexed citations
3.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2019). Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients’ Perspectives on Experiences With Music in Everyday Life: A Multifaceted and Dynamic Phenomenon. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 13. 1229–1229. 23 indexed citations
4.
Gfeller, Kate. (2016). Music-based training for pediatric CI recipients: A systematic analysis of published studies. European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases. 133. S50–S56. 26 indexed citations
5.
Driscoll, Virginia, et al.. (2016). Music Perception of Adolescents Using Electroacoustic Hearing. Otology & Neurotology. 37(2). e141–e147. 22 indexed citations
6.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2015). Do Communication Disorders Extend to Musical Messages? An Answer from Children with Hearing Loss or Autism Spectrum Disorders. Journal of Music Therapy. 52(1). 78–116. 17 indexed citations
7.
Gfeller, Kate, Dongjie Jiang, Jacob Oleson, et al.. (2012). The Effects of Musical and Linguistic Components in Recognition of Real-World Musical Excerpts by Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Adults. Journal of Music Therapy. 49(1). 68–101. 36 indexed citations
8.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2011). How we do it: adaptation of music instruction for pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Cochlear Implants International. 12(4). 205–208. 6 indexed citations
9.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2011). Music Therapy for Preschool Cochlear Implant Recipients. Music Therapy Perspectives. 29(1). 39–49. 31 indexed citations
10.
Gfeller, Kate, Dingfeng Jiang, Jacob Oleson, Virginia Driscoll, & John F. Knutson. (2010). Temporal Stability of Music Perception and Appraisal Scores of Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(1). 28–34. 46 indexed citations
11.
Driscoll, Virginia, Jacob Oleson, Dingfeng Jiang, & Kate Gfeller. (2009). Effects of Training on Recognition of Musical Instruments Presented through Cochlear Implant Simulations. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 20(1). 71–82. 46 indexed citations
12.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2007). Accuracy of Cochlear Implant Recipients on Pitch Perception, Melody Recognition, and Speech Reception in Noise. Ear and Hearing. 28(3). 412–423. 208 indexed citations
13.
Gantz, Bruce J., Christopher W. Turner, & Kate Gfeller. (2006). Acoustic plus Electric Speech Processing: Preliminary Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of the Iowa/Nucleus Hybrid Implant. Audiology and Neurotology. 11(Suppl. 1). 63–68. 131 indexed citations
14.
Gantz, Bruce J., Christopher W. Turner, Kate Gfeller, & Mary W. Lowder. (2005). Preservation of Hearing in Cochlear Implant Surgery: Advantages of Combined Electrical and Acoustical Speech Processing. The Laryngoscope. 115(5). 796–802. 416 indexed citations
15.
Olszewski, Carol, et al.. (2005). Familiar melody recognition by children and adults using cochlear implants and normal hearing children. Cochlear Implants International. 6(3). 123–140. 40 indexed citations
16.
Gfeller, Kate, et al.. (2005). Recognition of ???Real-World??? Musical Excerpts by Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Adults. Ear and Hearing. 26(3). 237–250. 93 indexed citations
17.
Gfeller, Kate, Christopher W. Turner, Maureen Mehr, et al.. (2002). Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants International. 3(1). 29–53. 188 indexed citations
18.
Gfeller, Kate, Shelley Witt, Maureen Mehr, George Woodworth, & John F. Knutson. (2002). Effects of Frequency, Instrumental Family, and Cochlear Implant Type on Timbre Recognition and Appraisal. Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology. 111(4). 349–356. 131 indexed citations
19.
Gfeller, Kate, Shelley Witt, Linda Spencer, Julie Stordahl, & Bruce Tomblin. (1999). Musical Involvement and Enjoyment of Children Who Use Cochlear Implants.. The Volta Review. 100(4). 37 indexed citations
20.
Hanson, Nicholas, Kate Gfeller, Graeme F. Woodworth, Elizabeth Swanson, & Linda Garand. (1996). A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Differing Types and Difficulty of Music Activities in Programming for Older Adults with Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders. Journal of Music Therapy. 33(2). 93–123. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026