Dawna E. Lewis

3.2k total citations
72 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Dawna E. Lewis is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Dawna E. Lewis has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 28 papers in Speech and Hearing and 26 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Dawna E. Lewis's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (63 papers), Noise Effects and Management (28 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (25 papers). Dawna E. Lewis is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (63 papers), Noise Effects and Management (28 papers) and Speech and Audio Processing (25 papers). Dawna E. Lewis collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Dawna E. Lewis's co-authors include Patricia G. Stelmachowicz, Brenda M. Hoover, Andrea L. Pittman, Mary Pat Moeller, Ryan W. McCreery, Daniel Valente, Sangsook Choi, Elizabeth Heinrichs‐Graham, Marc Brennan and Judy G. Kopun and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America and Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research.

In The Last Decade

Dawna E. Lewis

69 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dawna E. Lewis United States 28 2.2k 952 846 814 638 72 2.5k
Brenda M. Hoover United States 27 1.9k 0.9× 738 0.8× 1.0k 1.2× 685 0.8× 481 0.8× 35 2.2k
Susan Scollie Canada 29 2.3k 1.1× 952 1.0× 1.1k 1.3× 436 0.5× 791 1.2× 120 2.5k
Patricia G. Stelmachowicz United States 32 2.5k 1.2× 1.1k 1.2× 1.2k 1.4× 704 0.9× 838 1.3× 89 2.9k
Ruth A. Bentler United States 29 2.8k 1.3× 1.7k 1.8× 1.2k 1.4× 762 0.9× 785 1.2× 105 3.2k
Teresa A. Zwolan United States 30 2.4k 1.1× 833 0.9× 1.4k 1.7× 780 1.0× 414 0.6× 72 2.7k
Ryan W. McCreery United States 28 1.8k 0.8× 664 0.7× 871 1.0× 698 0.9× 437 0.7× 110 2.1k
Mary Joe Osberger United States 29 2.3k 1.1× 498 0.5× 856 1.0× 1.3k 1.6× 521 0.8× 77 2.8k
Andrea L. Pittman United States 20 1.4k 0.6× 476 0.5× 536 0.6× 656 0.8× 441 0.7× 38 1.7k
Karen Iler Kirk United States 35 3.3k 1.5× 716 0.8× 1.0k 1.2× 2.0k 2.5× 690 1.1× 87 3.8k
Anthony J. Spahr United States 25 3.1k 1.5× 1.5k 1.5× 1.7k 2.1× 446 0.5× 931 1.5× 42 3.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Dawna E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dawna E. Lewis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dawna E. Lewis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dawna E. Lewis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dawna E. Lewis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dawna E. Lewis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dawna E. Lewis. The network helps show where Dawna E. Lewis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dawna E. Lewis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dawna E. Lewis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dawna E. Lewis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dawna E. Lewis. Dawna E. Lewis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chatterjee, Monita, et al.. (2025). Age-Related Changes in Acoustic Cue Weighting for Emotional Prosody Identification by Adult Listeners. Ear and Hearing. 47(2). 558–575.
2.
Gordon, Katherine R., Dawna E. Lewis, Stephanie Lowry, et al.. (2024). Remote Microphones Support Speech Recognition in Noise and Reverberation for Children With a Language Disorder. Language Speech and Hearing Services in Schools. 56(1). 225–233. 1 indexed citations
4.
Lewis, Dawna E.. (2023). Speech Understanding in Complex Environments by School-Age Children with Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss. Seminars in Hearing. 44(S 01). S36–S48. 1 indexed citations
5.
McCreery, Ryan W., et al.. (2015). High-Frequency Audibility: The Effects of Audiometric Configuration, Stimulus Type, and Device. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 26(2). 128–137. 27 indexed citations
6.
Brennan, Marc, Ryan W. McCreery, Judy G. Kopun, et al.. (2014). Paired Comparisons of Nonlinear Frequency Compression, Extended Bandwidth, and Restricted Bandwidth Hearing Aid Processing for Children and Adults with Hearing Loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 25(10). 983–998. 35 indexed citations
7.
Lewis, Dawna E., et al.. (2014). Effect of Minimal/Mild Hearing Loss on Children’s Speech Understanding in a Simulated Classroom. Ear and Hearing. 36(1). 136–144. 57 indexed citations
8.
Lewis, Dawna E., et al.. (2012). Effects of Reverberation on Speech Recognition in Stationary and Modulated Noise by School-Aged Children and Young Adults. Ear and Hearing. 33(6). 731–744. 58 indexed citations
9.
Lewis, Dawna E., Brenda M. Hoover, Sangsook Choi, & Patricia G. Stelmachowicz. (2010). Relationship Between Speech Perception in Noise and Phonological Awareness Skills for Children With Normal Hearing. Ear and Hearing. 31(6). 761–768. 29 indexed citations
10.
McCreery, Ryan W., et al.. (2009). Performance-Intensity Functions for Normal-Hearing Adults and Children Using Computer-Aided Speech Perception Assessment. Ear and Hearing. 31(1). 95–101. 34 indexed citations
11.
12.
Lewis, Dawna E. & Thomas D. Carrell. (2007). The effect of amplitude modulation on intelligibility of time-varying sinusoidal speech in children and adults. Perception & Psychophysics. 69(7). 1140–1151. 9 indexed citations
13.
Moeller, Mary Pat, et al.. (2007). Vocalizations of Infants with Hearing Loss Compared with Infants with Normal Hearing: Part II – Transition to Words. Ear and Hearing. 28(5). 628–642. 104 indexed citations
14.
Moeller, Mary Pat, et al.. (2007). Vocalizations of Infants with Hearing Loss Compared with Infants with Normal Hearing: Part I – Phonetic Development. Ear and Hearing. 28(5). 605–627. 160 indexed citations
15.
Pittman, Andrea L., Dawna E. Lewis, Brenda M. Hoover, & Patricia G. Stelmachowicz. (2005). Rapid Word-Learning in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Children: Effects of Age, Receptive Vocabulary, and High-Frequency Amplification. Ear and Hearing. 26(6). 619–629. 73 indexed citations
16.
Stelmachowicz, Patricia G., Andrea L. Pittman, Brenda M. Hoover, Dawna E. Lewis, & Mary Pat Moeller. (2004). The Importance of High-Frequency Audibility in the Speech and Language Development of Children With Hearing Loss. Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery. 130(5). 556–556. 211 indexed citations
17.
Stelmachowicz, Patricia G., et al.. (1998). A Comparison of Threshold-Based Fitting Strategies for Nonlinear Hearing Aids. Ear and Hearing. 19(2). 131–138. 26 indexed citations
18.
Moeller, Mary Pat, et al.. (1996). Longitudinal Study of FM System Use in Nonacademic Settings: Effects on Language Development. Ear and Hearing. 17(1). 28–41. 29 indexed citations
19.
Lewis, Dawna E.. (1995). FM Systems: A Good Idea That Keeps Getting Better.. The Volta Review. 97(3). 4 indexed citations
20.
Lewis, Dawna E., et al.. (1991). Localization Ability in Infants with Simulated Unilateral Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 12(6). 371–376. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026