Saul Fine
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Baruch NevoMark RoyalChristopher D. NyeFritz DrasgowCoralia ȘuleaGabriel FischmannFlorin Alin SavaBen‐Roy Do
- Topics
- Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers)Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers)Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers)
In The Last Decade
Saul Fine
25 papers receiving 485 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 345
- Social Psychology 164
- Sociology and Political Science 160
- Clinical Psychology 84
- Gender Studies 62
Countries citing papers authored by Saul Fine
This map shows the geographic impact of Saul Fine's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Saul Fine with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Saul Fine more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Saul Fine
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Saul Fine. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Saul Fine. The network helps show where Saul Fine may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Saul Fine
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Saul Fine. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Saul Fine based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Saul Fine. Saul Fine is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | Psychological Predictors of Successful Entrepreneurship in China: An Empirical Study | 14 |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 69 | |
| 16 | 129 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | Validity Study: Relationships between Personality Measures and Job Performance Ratings among Far Eastern Couriers | 3 |
| 20 | Validity Study Cognitive Ability, Personality, and Low Fidelity Simulation Measures in Predicting Training Performance among Customer Service Representatives | 2 |
About Saul Fine
Saul Fine is a scholar working on Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and General Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 541 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (9 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (6 papers) and Occupational Health and Safety Research (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (345 citations), Social Psychology (164 citations) and Gender Studies (62 citations). Saul Fine has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, India and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Baruch Nevo, Mark Royal, Christopher D. Nye, Fritz Drasgow, Coralia Șulea, Gabriel Fischmann, Florin Alin Sava, Ben‐Roy Do, Hui Meng and Bernd Marcus. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, The International Journal of Human Resource Management and Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.