Mark Royal

504 total citations
11 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

Mark Royal is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Royal has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management and 3 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Mark Royal's work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers). Mark Royal is often cited by papers focused on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Community Health and Development (3 papers) and Service-Learning and Community Engagement (2 papers). Mark Royal collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark Royal's co-authors include Robert J. Rossi, Saul Fine, K. Dow Scott and Tom Agnew and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Indicators Research, The Journal of Educational Research and Journal of Community Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Mark Royal

11 papers receiving 271 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Royal United States	6	127	108	89	70	68	11	329
Deléne Visser South Africa	11	59 0.5×	89 0.8×	133 1.5×	123 1.8×	59 0.9×	43	355
Luisa Barthauer Germany	6	49 0.4×	87 0.8×	115 1.3×	66 0.9×	48 0.7×	11	277
Alexandra E. MacDougall United States	12	64 0.5×	68 0.6×	60 0.7×	44 0.6×	42 0.6×	27	296
Gideon Arulmani United Kingdom	8	49 0.4×	95 0.9×	51 0.6×	82 1.2×	86 1.3×	16	275
Karin Crawford United Kingdom	12	86 0.7×	176 1.6×	29 0.3×	37 0.5×	99 1.5×	37	385
Zandy B. Leibowitz United States	10	41 0.3×	81 0.8×	122 1.4×	68 1.0×	44 0.6×	22	310
Laura F. Poteat United States	5	44 0.3×	120 1.1×	151 1.7×	156 2.2×	83 1.2×	6	362
Darja Miščenko Australia	6	51 0.4×	47 0.4×	190 2.1×	88 1.3×	84 1.2×	7	347
Valerie Martin Conley United States	12	75 0.6×	294 2.7×	37 0.4×	160 2.3×	64 0.9×	44	513
Haim H. Gaziel Israel	12	45 0.4×	258 2.4×	74 0.8×	82 1.2×	68 1.0×	41	413

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Royal

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Royal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Royal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Royal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Royal

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Royal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Royal. The network helps show where Mark Royal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Royal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Royal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Royal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Royal. Mark Royal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (2017). Breaking Engagement Apart: The Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Engagement Strategies. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 10(1). 127–140. 44 indexed citations

2.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (2012). Retention of Key Talent and the Role of Rewards. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 21(4). 19 indexed citations

3.

Scott, K. Dow, et al.. (2011). Reward Fairness: Slippery Slope or Manageable Terrain?. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 20(4). 4 indexed citations

4.

Agnew, Tom & Mark Royal. (2011). The Enemy of Engagement. 2 indexed citations

5.

Scott, K. Dow, et al.. (2010). The Role of Rewards in Building Employee Engagement. Loyola eCommons (Loyola University Chicago). 19(4). 2 indexed citations

6.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (2008). Leveraging Employee Engagement: The Practical Implications. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. 1(1). 56–59. 38 indexed citations

7.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (2006). Why some companies excel at conducting business globally. 25(4). 3–10. 1 indexed citations

8.

Royal, Mark & Robert J. Rossi. (1999). Predictors of Within-School Differences in Teachers' Sense of Community. The Journal of Educational Research. 92(5). 259–266. 22 indexed citations

9.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (1997). Schools as Communities. 37 indexed citations

10.

Royal, Mark & Robert J. Rossi. (1996). Individual-level correlates of sense of community: Findings from workplace and school. Journal of Community Psychology. 24(4). 395–416. 155 indexed citations

11.

Royal, Mark, et al.. (1993). A comparative approach to assessing the quality of life of intercollegiate athletes. Social Indicators Research. 29(3). 317–330. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact