Sarah Malone
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roland BrünkenLeslie SpencerTroy B. AdamsElizabeth B. YostJochen KühnMichael TheesSebastian KappMarkus Vogel
- Topics
- Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (11 papers)Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers)Traffic and Road Safety (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Sarah Malone
32 papers receiving 600 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 123
- Human-Computer Interaction 109
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 105
- Education 105
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 102
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Malone
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Malone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Malone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Malone more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Malone
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Malone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Malone. The network helps show where Sarah Malone may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Malone
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Malone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Malone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Malone. Sarah Malone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 17 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 19 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Appreciative Leadership: Defining Effective Leadership Methods | 7 |
About Sarah Malone
Sarah Malone is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 35 papers that have together received 629 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (11 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (6 papers) and Traffic and Road Safety (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (109 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (102 citations). Sarah Malone has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Roland Brünken, Leslie Spencer, Troy B. Adams, Elizabeth B. Yost, Jochen Kühn, Michael Thees, Sebastian Kapp, Markus Vogel, Ralph M. Bunte and Andrew Loughney. Their work appears in journals such as Sensors, Frontiers in Psychology and Accident Analysis & Prevention.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.