Sarah Fraser
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Family Practice top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers)Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers)
- Journals
- Neurourology and UrodynamicsPubMedBMJ
- Partner nations
- United KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Sarah Fraser
5 papers receiving 548 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 274
- General Health Professions 271
- Education 99
- Family Practice 89
- Psychiatry and Mental health 59
Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Fraser
This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Fraser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Fraser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Fraser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Fraser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Fraser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Fraser. The network helps show where Sarah Fraser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Fraser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Fraser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Fraser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Fraser. Sarah Fraser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beyond the training: The benefits of peer support and improved self-perceptions experienced by women completing a 12 week PFM training program | 2 |
| 2 | Psychosocial factors influencing physiotherapeutic adherence to group-based or individualized pelvic floor rehabilitation: perceptions of older women with urinary incontinence | 2 |
| 3 | Art of Family Medicine: Art for the sake of medicine. | 1 |
| 4 | Peer support: Does it hold the key to decreasing self-stigma and improving self-management in older women with urinary incontinence? | 1 |
| 5 | Coping with complexity: educating for capabilitybreakdown → | 605 |
About Sarah Fraser
Sarah Fraser is a scholar working on Family Practice, Rheumatology and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 5 papers that have together received 611 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (2 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (89 citations), General Health Professions (271 citations) and Research and Theory (9 citations). Sarah Fraser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Trisha Greenhalgh, Kenneth Southall, Mélanie Morin, Chantale Dumoulin and Joanie Mercier. Their work appears in journals such as Neurourology and Urodynamics, PubMed and BMJ.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.