Countries where authors publish in Neurourology and Urodynamics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Neurourology and Urodynamics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neurourology and Urodynamics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics.
About Neurourology and Urodynamics
The 5.5k papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics in the last decades have received a total of 110.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Neurourology and Urodynamics usually cover Urology (3.7k papers), Rheumatology (3.7k papers) and Epidemiology (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Pelvic floor disorders treatments (3.7k papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (3.5k papers), Urinary Tract Infections Management (1.2k papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (821 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (755 papers), Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (332 papers), Hernia repair and management (253 papers) and Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries (220 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Neurourology and Urodynamics are Paul Abrams, Derek Griffiths, Philip Van Kerrebroeck, Linda Cardozo, Peter Rosier, Magnus Fall, U. Ulmsten, Jerry G. Blaivas, Arne Victor and Alan Wein.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.