Michiel Westerman
- Family Practice top 2%
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills 3
-
- Innovations in Medical Education 21
- Medical Education and Admissions 3
- Research and Theory top 10%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Diversity and Career in Medicine 6
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 4
-
- Problem and Project Based Learning 3
-
- Delphi Technique in Research 3
-
- Biomedical and Engineering Education 2
- Co-authors
- Pim W. TeunissenFedde ScheeleCees van der VleutenJoanne P.I. FokkemaRobert A. de LeeuwC. E. H. SiegertNadine van der LeeAlbert Scherpbier
- Journals
- Journal of Medical Internet Research (1 paper)Journal of Psychosomatic Research (1 paper)Academic Medicine (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Michiel Westerman
28 papers receiving 817 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Family Practice 135
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 611
- Research and Theory 14
- Gender Studies 140
- General Health Professions 252
Countries citing papers authored by Michiel Westerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Michiel Westerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michiel Westerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michiel Westerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michiel Westerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michiel Westerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michiel Westerman. The network helps show where Michiel Westerman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michiel Westerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2019 | 37 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 12 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2018 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 59 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 27 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 24 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 35 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 64 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 22 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 218 |
About Michiel Westerman
Michiel Westerman is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Gender Studies, having authored 30 papers that have together received 840 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (21 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers), Problem and Project Based Learning (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (3 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (3 papers) and Biomedical and Engineering Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (135 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (611 citations) and Research and Theory (14 citations). Michiel Westerman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Pim W. Teunissen, Fedde Scheele, Cees van der Vleuten, Joanne P.I. Fokkema, Robert A. de Leeuw, C. E. H. Siegert, Nadine van der Lee, Albert Scherpbier, Albert J.J.A. Scherpbier and Kieran Walsh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medical Internet Research, Journal of Psychosomatic Research and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.