Sandra L. Furterer

39 papers receiving 657 citations

Peers

Sandra L. Furterer
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Management Information Systems 470
  • Strategy and Management 384
  • Management Science and Operations Research 119
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 117
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 48
Replace José Dinis‐Carvalho with:
José Dinis‐Carvalho Portugal
Sylvain Landry Canada
Jennifer Cross United States
Jostein Pettersen Sweden
Charles A. Liedtke United States
Nicola Bateman United Kingdom
Alessandro Laureani United Kingdom
Saja Ahmed Albliwi United Kingdom
Roland R. Cavanagh
Peter S. Pande
Sandra L. Furterer relative to José Dinis‐Carvalho Portugal José Dinis‐Carvalho's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
José Dinis‐Carvalho · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra L. Furterer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra L. Furterer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra L. Furterer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra L. Furterer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra L. Furterer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra L. Furterer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra L. Furterer. The network helps show where Sandra L. Furterer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra L. Furterer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra L. Furterer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra L. Furterer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra L. Furterer. Sandra L. Furterer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 1
5 1
6 6
7 0
8 2
9 20
10 7
11 15
12 22
13 8
14 1
15 19
16 0
17
Lean Six Sigma in Service: Applications and Case Studies - 978-1-4200-7888-6
6
18 12
19
A Novel Methodology to Enhance Business Alignment Using Quantitative QFD and Business Modeling Tools
1
20
AC 2007-691: A DEPARTMENTAL REFORM STRATEGY AND THE RESULTANT NATIONAL MODEL FOR AN UNDERGRADUATE INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CURRICULUM
1

About Sandra L. Furterer

Sandra L. Furterer is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Architecture and Media Technology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quality and Supply Management (25 papers), Engineering Education and Curriculum Development (13 papers) and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management Information Systems (470 citations), Strategy and Management (384 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (27 citations). Sandra L. Furterer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Arab Emirates and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ahmad Elshennawy, Jiju Antony, Elizabeth A. Cudney, Olivia McDermott, Michael Sony, Matthew Pepper, Chad Laux, Jose Arturo Garza‐Reyes, Mahender Singh Kaswan and Anil Kumar Tiwari. Their work appears in journals such as Computers & Industrial Engineering, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management and Education + Training.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026