Sam Reid

734 total citations
10 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

Sam Reid is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Sam Reid has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 5 papers in Education and 3 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Sam Reid's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers). Sam Reid is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (4 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (3 papers). Sam Reid collaborates with scholars based in United States, Mexico and China. Sam Reid's co-authors include Katherine K. Perkins, Michael Dubson, Ron LeMaster, Carl Wieman, Wendy K. Adams, Noah D. Finkelstein, Sarah B. McKagan, Emily B. Moore, Peter Chin and Kathy Perkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, The Physics Teacher and The Journal of Interactive Learning Research.

In The Last Decade

Sam Reid

8 papers receiving 353 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Sam Reid United States	4	249	150	122	57	50	10	413
Miky Ronen Israel	11	346 1.4×	234 1.6×	89 0.7×	83 1.5×	87 1.7×	43	530
Shannon Sung United States	10	185 0.7×	76 0.5×	76 0.6×	42 0.7×	35 0.7×	22	319
Marios Papaevripidou Cyprus	7	226 0.9×	119 0.8×	95 0.8×	27 0.5×	42 0.8×	13	332
Tomi Jaakkola Finland	10	329 1.3×	224 1.5×	123 1.0×	119 2.1×	70 1.4×	20	548
Konstantinos Τ. Kotsis Greece	12	291 1.2×	165 1.1×	62 0.5×	117 2.1×	77 1.5×	153	593
Mustafa Çevikbaş Germany	10	320 1.3×	82 0.5×	45 0.4×	54 0.9×	73 1.5×	18	422
Jirarat Sitthiworachart Thailand	12	276 1.1×	136 0.9×	34 0.3×	139 2.4×	137 2.7×	53	481
Kevin W. McElhaney United States	13	308 1.2×	297 2.0×	72 0.6×	176 3.1×	45 0.9×	35	568
Nitza Barnea Israel	7	273 1.1×	112 0.7×	36 0.3×	25 0.4×	32 0.6×	8	338
Allan Knight United States	7	302 1.2×	112 0.7×	83 0.7×	70 1.2×	55 1.1×	15	458

Countries citing papers authored by Sam Reid

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sam Reid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sam Reid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sam Reid more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sam Reid

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sam Reid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sam Reid. The network helps show where Sam Reid may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sam Reid

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sam Reid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sam Reid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sam Reid. Sam Reid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Reid, Sam, et al.. (2022). The investigation of biases in the evaluation and knowledge of foods’ healthiness and disordered eating in a community sample.. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement. 55(1). 14–22. 1 indexed citations

2.

Reid, Sam & Peter Chin. (2021). Assessing critical thinking in L2: An exploratory study. 25(1). 8–21. 2 indexed citations

3.

Perkins, Katherine K., et al.. (2019). Dashboard to evaluate student engagement with interactive simulations. The Physics Video Demonstration Database (Cornell University). 3 indexed citations

4.

Reid, Sam, et al.. (2019). An Analysis of Student Survey Results on Classroom Experiences and Learning Outcomes Within a Large-Scale English Discussion Program. Rikkyo University academic repository (Rikko Roots) (Rikkyo University). 7. 272–297. 1 indexed citations

5.

Reid, Sam, et al.. (2018). Parallel DOM Architecture for Accessible Interactive Simulations. 1–8. 8 indexed citations

6.

Reid, Sam. (2018). Encouraging Balanced Participation in Group Discussions. Rikkyo University academic repository (Rikko Roots) (Rikkyo University). 6. 149–156. 1 indexed citations

7.

Adams, Wendy K., Sam Reid, Ron LeMaster, et al.. (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part II – Interface Design. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 19(4). 551–577. 62 indexed citations

8.

Adams, Wendy K., Sam Reid, Ron LeMaster, et al.. (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part 1 - Engagement and Learning. The Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 19(3). 397–419. 85 indexed citations

9.

Perkins, Katherine K., Wendy K. Adams, Michael Dubson, et al.. (2005). PhET: Interactive Simulations for Teaching and Learning Physics. The Physics Teacher. 44(1). 18–23. 249 indexed citations

10.

Perkins, Kathy, Wendy K. Adams, Noah D. Finkelstein, et al.. (2004). The Physics Education Technology Project: A New Suite of Physics Simulations. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact