The Physics Teacher

6.5k papers and 29.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 6.5k papers published in The Physics Teacher in the last decades have received a total of 29.6k indexed citations. Papers published in The Physics Teacher usually cover Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.9k papers), Education (910 papers) and Media Technology (660 papers) specifically the topics of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Studies (1.8k papers), Experimental Learning in Engineering (630 papers) and Science Education and Pedagogy (607 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Physics Teacher are Elisha Huggins, David Hestenes, Malcolm Wells, Dan MacIsaac, J. E. Field, Erwin W. Müller, Larry D. Kirkpatrick, Thomas B. Greenslade, Raymond A. Serway and Jochen Kühn.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Physics Teacher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Physics Teacher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Physics Teacher.

Countries where authors publish in The Physics Teacher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Physics Teacher. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Physics Teacher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Physics Teacher more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025