Ruth L. Healey

902 total citations
41 papers, 586 citations indexed

About

Ruth L. Healey is a scholar working on Education, Geography, Planning and Development and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ruth L. Healey has authored 41 papers receiving a total of 586 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Education, 11 papers in Geography, Planning and Development and 9 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Ruth L. Healey's work include Higher Education Practises and Engagement (18 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (10 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers). Ruth L. Healey is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Practises and Engagement (18 papers), Geography Education and Pedagogy (10 papers) and Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers). Ruth L. Healey collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Ruth L. Healey's co-authors include Mick Healey, Harry West, Jennifer Hill, Niamh Moore‐Cherry, Dawn T. Nicholson, Derek France, Alison Cook‐Sather, Lucy Mercer‐Mapstone, Elizabeth Marquis and Kelly Matthews and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Environment and Planning A Economy and Space and Studies in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Ruth L. Healey

40 papers receiving 556 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ruth L. Healey United Kingdom 13 403 124 91 42 38 41 586
Hilary Burgess United Kingdom 10 278 0.7× 56 0.5× 9 0.1× 24 0.6× 26 0.7× 26 403
Diane Watt Canada 7 84 0.2× 146 1.2× 12 0.1× 56 1.3× 21 0.6× 8 350
Tracy Glynn Canada 4 275 0.7× 99 0.8× 14 0.2× 13 0.3× 12 0.3× 5 394
Daniel H. Bowen United States 11 238 0.6× 121 1.0× 10 0.1× 37 0.9× 14 0.4× 24 428
Andrew Metcalfe Australia 10 86 0.2× 113 0.9× 22 0.2× 25 0.6× 14 0.4× 39 288
Lisa Taylor United States 10 150 0.4× 103 0.8× 7 0.1× 23 0.5× 12 0.3× 49 368
Jesse M. Smith United States 9 48 0.1× 265 2.1× 26 0.3× 77 1.8× 36 0.9× 14 424
Heather L. Bell United States 6 48 0.1× 180 1.5× 27 0.3× 88 2.1× 28 0.7× 9 343
Kathleen S. Lowney United States 9 151 0.4× 135 1.1× 7 0.1× 51 1.2× 44 1.2× 20 354
Missy Morton New Zealand 7 236 0.6× 199 1.6× 6 0.1× 27 0.6× 61 1.6× 21 471

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth L. Healey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth L. Healey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth L. Healey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth L. Healey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth L. Healey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth L. Healey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth L. Healey. The network helps show where Ruth L. Healey may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ruth L. Healey

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ruth L. Healey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ruth L. Healey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ruth L. Healey. Ruth L. Healey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
3.
Cook‐Sather, Alison & Ruth L. Healey. (2024). Toward Greater Transparency and Inclusion in Manuscript Review Processes: A Relational Model. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal. 12. 1 indexed citations
4.
Healey, Mick & Ruth L. Healey. (2023). Reviewing the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal. 11. 5 indexed citations
5.
Healey, Mick & Ruth L. Healey. (2023). Searching the Literature on Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL): An Academic Literacies Perspective. Teaching & Learning Inquiry The ISSOTL Journal. 11. 5 indexed citations
6.
Healey, Mick, Ruth L. Healey, & Harry West. (2023). Reflections on disciplinary perspectives on students as partners. International Journal for Students as Partners. 7(1). 1–13. 6 indexed citations
8.
Healey, Ruth L., Derek France, Jennifer Hill, & Harry West. (2020). The history of the Higher Education Research Group of the UK Royal Geographical Society: The changing status and focus of geography education in the academy. Area. 54(1). 6–14. 5 indexed citations
9.
Hill, Jennifer, et al.. (2019). Pedagogic partnership in higher education: encountering emotion in learning and enhancing student wellbeing. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 45(2). 167–185. 64 indexed citations
10.
Healey, Ruth L., et al.. (2019). By any other name? The impacts of differing assumptions, expectations, and misconceptions in bringing about resistance to student-staff partnership. International Journal for Students as Partners. 3(1). 106–122. 15 indexed citations
11.
Matthews, Kelly, Lucy Mercer‐Mapstone, Anita Acai, et al.. (2018). Enhancing outcomes and reducing inhibitors to the engagement of students and staff in learning and teaching partnerships: implications for academic development. The International Journal for Academic Development. 24(3). 246–259. 50 indexed citations
12.
Bryson, Colin, Abbi Flint, Catherine Bovill, et al.. (2018). Proceedings of the RAISE International Colloquium on Partnership. 2(1). 99–136. 1 indexed citations
13.
Healey, Mick & Ruth L. Healey. (2018). 'It depends': Exploring the context-dependent nature of students as partners practices and policies. International Journal for Students as Partners. 2(1). 1–10. 77 indexed citations
14.
Moore‐Cherry, Niamh, et al.. (2015). Inclusive partnership: enhancing student engagement in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 40(1). 84–103. 51 indexed citations
15.
Healey, Ruth L.. (2012). The Power of Debate: Reflections on the Potential of Debates for Engaging Students in Critical Thinking about Controversial Geographical Topics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 36(2). 239–257. 35 indexed citations
16.
Vajoczki, Susan, et al.. (2011). Professional Development in Teaching and Learning for Early Career Academic Geographers: Contexts, Practices and Tensions. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 35(3). 395–408. 6 indexed citations
17.
Healey, Ruth L.. (2010). Gender Variation in Asylum Experiences in the UK: The Role of Patriarchy and Coping Strategies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2 indexed citations
18.
Bærenholdt, Jørgen Ole, et al.. (2010). Performing Academic Practice: Using the Master Class to Build Postgraduate Discursive Competences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 34(2). 283–298. 4 indexed citations
19.
Boyd, William, Ruth L. Healey, Susan W. Hardwick, et al.. (2008). ‘None of Us Sets Out To Hurt People’: The Ethical Geographer and Geography Curricula in Higher Education. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 32(1). 37–50. 36 indexed citations
20.
Wellens, Jane, et al.. (2006). Teaching Geography for Social Transformation. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 30(1). 117–131. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026