Roy T. Cook

54 papers receiving 415 citations

Peers

Roy T. Cook
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
  • History and Philosophy of Science 131
  • Theoretical Computer Science 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 288
  • Philosophy 158
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 162
Replace Jan Woleński with:
Jan Woleński Poland
Stephen Read United Kingdom
Gabriel Uzquiano United States
Volker Halbach United Kingdom
Agustín Rayo United States
Gila Sher United States
Jeffrey Ketland United Kingdom
Allen Hazen Australia
Fraser MacBride United Kingdom
Francesco Berto Netherlands
Roy T. Cook relative to Jan Woleński Poland Jan Woleński's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Jan Woleński · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Roy T. Cook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Roy T. Cook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Roy T. Cook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Roy T. Cook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Roy T. Cook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Roy T. Cook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Roy T. Cook. The network helps show where Roy T. Cook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Roy T. Cook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Roy T. Cook Line = papers co-authored together Roy T. Cook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201053
2 200433
3 200227
4 200923
5 200523
6 201422
7 200319
8 200619
9 200518
10
Basic laws of arithmetic : derived using concept-script : Volumes I & II
201314
11 201213
12 201411
13 201711
14 200911
15 201411
16 20079
17 20008
18 20128
19 20137
20 20067

About Roy T. Cook

Roy T. Cook is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Philosophy, Computational Theory and Mathematics, History and Philosophy of Science and Artificial Intelligence, having authored 60 papers that have together received 462 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (31 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (11 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (11 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (11 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (9 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (5 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers) and Comics and Graphic Narratives (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (131 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (29 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (288 citations), Philosophy (158 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (162 citations). Roy T. Cook has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Øystein Linnebo, Philip A. Ebert, Geoffrey Hellman, Aaron Meskin, Gottlob Frege, Michael Beaney, Bing-Zhi Yang and R.C. Goodfellow. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, History and Philosophy of Logic and Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact