Stephen Read
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 8
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 19
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 10
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 6
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 17
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 4
-
- Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 10
- Logic, programming, and type systems 6
- Co-authors
- Graham PriestDiana Van LanckerDaniel KemplerDorothy EdgingtonNorman KretzmannJan PinborgJean-Yves BéziauPeter Clark
- Journals
- History and Philosophy of Logic (6 papers)Mind (5 papers)The Philosophical Quarterly (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Stephen Read
59 papers receiving 550 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- History and Philosophy of Science 153
- Theoretical Computer Science 28
- Philosophy 244
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 266
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 168
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Read
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Read's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Read with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Read more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Read
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Read. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Read. The network helps show where Stephen Read may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Stephen Read, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 11 | |
| 4 | Robert Fland, or Elandus Dialecticus? | 2017 | 2 |
| 5 | 2016 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2010 | 50 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 11 | The Philosophy of Thomas Reid: A Collection of Essays | 2003 | 3 |
| 12 | Medieval theories: properties of terms | 2002 | 9 |
| 13 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 14 | Hugh Maccoll and the algebra of strict implication | 1998 | 4 |
| 15 | The Slingshot Argument | 1993 | 2 |
| 16 | 1991 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 45 | |
| 18 | 1987 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 9 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 10 |
About Stephen Read
Stephen Read is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Classics and General Decision Sciences, having authored 65 papers that have together received 677 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (19 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (10 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (10 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (8 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (6 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (153 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (28 citations), Philosophy (244 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (266 citations) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (168 citations). Stephen Read has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Graham Priest, Diana Van Lancker, Daniel Kempler, Dorothy Edgington, Norman Kretzmann, Jan Pinborg, Jean-Yves Béziau, Peter Clark, Alexander Broadie and J. S. Haldane. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Mind, The Philosophical Quarterly, Analysis and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.