Michael Beaney
-
- Philosophy, Science, and History 15
- Historical Philosophy and Science 5
- Philosophy and History of Science 2
- Theoretical Computer Science top 5%
- Philosophy top 1%
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 5
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 4
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 13
- General Psychology top 10%
-
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 3
-
- Philosophy, History, and Historiography 2
Michael Beaney
38 papers receiving 355 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- History and Philosophy of Science 166
- Theoretical Computer Science 30
- Philosophy 232
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 259
- General Psychology 12
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Beaney
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Beaney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Beaney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Beaney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Beaney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Beaney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Beaney. The network helps show where Michael Beaney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Michael Beaney, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 6 | Basic laws of arithmetic : derived using concept-script : Volumes I & II | 2013 | 14 |
| 7 | 2013 | 5 | |
| 8 | Putting analysis rightfully back into analytic philosophy | 2011 | 1 |
| 9 | 2010 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2007 | 8 | |
| 14 | Explaining the Mental: Naturalist and Non-Naturalist Approaches to Mental Acts and Processes | 2007 | 8 |
| 15 | Frege's philosophy of logic | 2005 | 0 |
| 16 | Frege's philosophy in context | 2005 | 1 |
| 17 | Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, Vol. I | 2005 | 3 |
| 18 | Collingwood's Critique of Analytic Philosophy' | 2001 | 3 |
| 19 | Conceptions of Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy | 2000 | 9 |
| 20 | The Frege reader | 1997 | 168 |
About Michael Beaney
Michael Beaney is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Theoretical Computer Science, Philosophy and General Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 442 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (15 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (3 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (2 papers) and Philosophy, History, and Historiography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (166 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (30 citations), Philosophy (232 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (259 citations) and General Psychology (12 citations). Michael Beaney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Hong Kong. Frequent co-authors include Gottlob Frege, Gregory Landini, Carlo Penco, Erich H. Reck, Roy T. Cook, Philip A. Ebert, Mogens Lærke and Thomas Uebel. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal for the History of Philosophy, Metaphilosophy, Philosophical Studies, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society and Journal of the Philosophy of History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.