Volker Halbach

1.4k citations
37 papers · 725 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Volker Halbach

35 papers receiving 671 citations

Peers

Volker Halbach
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 516
  • History and Philosophy of Science 170
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 350
  • Philosophy 225
  • Theoretical Computer Science 22
Replace Gila Sher with:
Gila Sher United States
Stephen Read United Kingdom
Roy T. Cook United States
Timothy Smiley United Kingdom
Gabriel Uzquiano United States
Jeffrey Ketland United Kingdom
Øystein Linnebo Norway
Agustín Rayo United States
Allen Hazen Australia
Fraser MacBride United Kingdom
Volker Halbach relative to Gila Sher United States Gila Sher's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Gila Sher · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Volker Halbach

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Volker Halbach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Volker Halbach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Volker Halbach more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Volker Halbach

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Volker Halbach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Volker Halbach. The network helps show where Volker Halbach may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Volker Halbach, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Volker Halbach Line = papers co-authored together Volker Halbach links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2014122
2 201196
3 200667
4 199443
5 200132
6 199931
7 200329
8 201526
9 199624
10 200524
11 201723
12 201419
13 200919
14 199917
15 200916
16 200115
17 200014
18 200314
19 200813
20 201410

About Volker Halbach

Volker Halbach is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 37 papers that have together received 725 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (23 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (21 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (7 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (6 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (4 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (516 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (170 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (350 citations), Philosophy (225 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (22 citations). Volker Halbach has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Leon Horsten, Philip Welch, Albert Visser and Hannes Leitgeb. Their work appears in journals such as Analysis, Journal of Philosophical Logic, The Review of Symbolic Logic, Journal of Symbolic Logic and Erkenntnis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact