Fraser MacBride

1.1k total citations
47 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

Fraser MacBride is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Fraser MacBride has authored 47 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 20 papers in History and Philosophy of Science and 20 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Fraser MacBride's work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (30 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers). Fraser MacBride is often cited by papers focused on Philosophy and Theoretical Science (30 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (13 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (12 papers). Fraser MacBride collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Fraser MacBride's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Philosophical Quarterly and The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

In The Last Decade

Fraser MacBride

41 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Fraser MacBride United Kingdom 11 337 227 201 98 50 47 432
Gabriel Uzquiano United States 12 329 1.0× 196 0.9× 159 0.8× 138 1.4× 90 1.8× 34 429
Thomas Hofweber United States 11 407 1.2× 298 1.3× 242 1.2× 67 0.7× 33 0.7× 34 543
Charles S. Chihara United States 11 263 0.8× 201 0.9× 219 1.1× 92 0.9× 81 1.6× 39 472
Linda Wetzel United States 9 284 0.8× 170 0.7× 152 0.8× 69 0.7× 62 1.2× 18 434
Bernard Linsky Canada 9 298 0.9× 198 0.9× 155 0.8× 116 1.2× 52 1.0× 56 398
Agustín Rayo United States 10 455 1.4× 290 1.3× 225 1.1× 154 1.6× 81 1.6× 29 557
Roy T. Cook United States 12 287 0.9× 158 0.7× 130 0.6× 188 1.9× 157 3.1× 60 456
Gottfried Gabriel Germany 9 287 0.9× 179 0.8× 216 1.1× 58 0.6× 33 0.7× 47 469
Matthias Schirn Germany 7 250 0.7× 123 0.5× 183 0.9× 85 0.9× 50 1.0× 34 389
Jody Azzouni United States 17 468 1.4× 328 1.4× 402 2.0× 92 0.9× 60 1.2× 53 762

Countries citing papers authored by Fraser MacBride

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fraser MacBride's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fraser MacBride with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fraser MacBride more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fraser MacBride

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fraser MacBride. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fraser MacBride. The network helps show where Fraser MacBride may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
MacBride, Fraser. (2021). Rudolf Carnap and David Lewis on Metaphysics. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
MacBride, Fraser. (2020). Relations (updated edition). Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 1 indexed citations
3.
MacBride, Fraser, et al.. (2018). DAVID LEWIS'S PLACE IN THE HISTORY OF LATE ANALYTIC PHILOSOPHY: HIS CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL METHODOLOGY. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 6(1). 53–74. 1 indexed citations
4.
MacBride, Fraser. (2018). On the Genealogy of Universals. Oxford University Press eBooks. 7 indexed citations
5.
MacBride, Fraser. (2018). Introduction. Oxford University Press eBooks.
6.
MacBride, Fraser. (2014). How Hochberg helped us take the ontological turn. dialectica. 68. 1 indexed citations
8.
MacBride, Fraser. (2014). The Unity of the Proposition, by Richard Gaskin.. Mind. 123(491). 898–901. 2 indexed citations
9.
MacBride, Fraser. (2014). How truth depends upon being. Analysis. 74(3). 370–378. 7 indexed citations
10.
MacBride, Fraser. (2013). For keeping truth in truthmaking. Analysis. 73(4). 686–695. 10 indexed citations
11.
MacBride, Fraser. (2013). How Involved do You Want to be in a Non-symmetric Relationship?. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 92(1). 1–16. 23 indexed citations
12.
MacBride, Fraser. (2011). Relations and Truthmaking. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society. 111(1pt1). 161–179. 17 indexed citations
13.
MacBride, Fraser. (2007). Neutral Relations Revisited. dialectica. 61(1). 25–56. 25 indexed citations
14.
MacBride, Fraser. (2005). Ramsey on Universals. ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam). 83–104. 1 indexed citations
15.
MacBride, Fraser. (2005). The Particular–Universal Distinction: A Dogma of Metaphysics?. Mind. 114(455). 565–614. 45 indexed citations
16.
MacBride, Fraser. (2004). WHENCE THE PARTICULAR-UNIVERSAL DISTINCTION?. Grazer Philosophische Studien. 67(1). 181–194. 6 indexed citations
17.
MacBride, Fraser. (2003). Introduction. The Philosophical Quarterly. 54(214). 1–15. 4 indexed citations
18.
MacBride, Fraser. (2002). Articulating Reasons: An Introduction To Inferentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 80(2). 237–238. 3 indexed citations
19.
MacBride, Fraser. (2002). TheProblem of Universals and the Limits of Truth-Making. Philosophical Papers. 31(1). 27–37. 9 indexed citations
20.
MacBride, Fraser. (2002). Truth-Making and Analysis: A Reply to Rodriguez-Pereyra. Philosophical Papers. 31(1). 49–61. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026