Jan Woleński

90 papers receiving 427 citations

Peers

Jan Woleński
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Theoretical Computer Science 43
  • History and Philosophy of Science 98
  • Linguistics and Language 62
  • General Psychology 15
  • Philosophy 113
Replace Francesco Orilia with:
Francesco Orilia Italy
Antoine Arnauld
Benson Mates United States
Friederike Moltmann France
Michael Beaney United Kingdom
Alexander P. D. Mourelatos United States
Patrick K Bastable
Ian Rumfitt United Kingdom
Jeffrey C. King United States
Brian Rotman United Kingdom
Jan Woleński relative to Francesco Orilia Italy Francesco Orilia's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.5×
Francesco Orilia · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Woleński

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Woleński's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Woleński with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Woleński more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Woleński

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Woleński. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Woleński. The network helps show where Jan Woleński may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Woleński, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Woleński Line = papers co-authored together Jan Woleński links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 125 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200450
2 198949
3 199132
4 198726
5 198822
6
On Actions, Products and Other Topics in Philosophy
199919
7
Mathematical logic in Poland 1900--1939: people, circles, institutions, ideas
199516
8 199315
9 199913
10 199812
11 199412
12 200811
13 201711
14 200410
15 19998
16
The Golden Age of Polish Philosophy: Kazimierz Twardowski's Philosophical Legacy
20097
17 19907
18 19916
19 20036
20 19906

About Jan Woleński

Jan Woleński is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy, Education and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 125 papers that have together received 493 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language and Culture (30 papers), Education and Cultural Studies (14 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (13 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (13 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (10 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (9 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (7 papers) and Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (43 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (98 citations), Linguistics and Language (62 citations), General Psychology (15 citations) and Philosophy (113 citations). Jan Woleński has collaborated with scholars based in Poland, Austria and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Ilkka Niiniluoto, Matti Sintonen, Johannes L. Brandl, Peter Simons, Jan Łukasiewicz, Roberto Poli, Friedrich Stadler, Stanisław Krajewski, Thomas Binder and Artur Rojszczak. Their work appears in journals such as History and Philosophy of Logic, Grazer Philosophische Studien, Studies in East European Thought, Studia Logica and Axiomathes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact