Geoffrey Hellman
- Theoretical Computer Science top 0.5%
- History and Theory of Mathematics 13
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Philosophy and History of Science 17
- Philosophy, Science, and History 6
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 19
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
-
- Quantum Mechanics and Applications 15
-
- Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms 10
- Advanced Algebra and Logic 4
-
- Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis 5
Geoffrey Hellman
67 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Theoretical Computer Science 164
- History and Philosophy of Science 415
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 366
- General Decision Sciences 43
- Management Science and Operations Research 220
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Hellman
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Hellman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Hellman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Hellman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Hellman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Hellman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Hellman. The network helps show where Geoffrey Hellman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Geoffrey Hellman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 3 | The History of Continua: Philosophical and Mathematical Perspectives | 2020 | 5 |
| 4 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 8 | Mereology in Philosophy of Mathematics | 2009 | 4 |
| 9 | Pluralism and the Foundations of Mathematics | 2006 | 10 |
| 10 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 47 | |
| 12 | Maximality vs. Extendability: Reflections on Structuralism and Set Theory: Essays in the History and Philosophy of Science an | 2002 | 1 |
| 13 | Some Ins and Outs of Indispensability | 1999 | 0 |
| 14 | 1998 | 6 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 42 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 22 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1987 | 11 | |
| 20 | 1981 | 6 |
About Geoffrey Hellman
Geoffrey Hellman is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (19 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (17 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Applications (15 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (13 papers), Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms (10 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (6 papers), Mathematical and Theoretical Analysis (5 papers) and Advanced Algebra and Logic (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Theoretical Computer Science (164 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (415 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (366 citations), General Decision Sciences (43 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (220 citations). Geoffrey Hellman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Stewart Shapiro, Simon Blackburn, Richard Healey, Solomon Feferman, John L. Bell, J. Michael Dunn, Roy T. Cook, Stewart Shapiro, Øystein Linnebo and Mary Leng. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophia Mathematica, Philosophy of Science, Noûs, Journal of Philosophical Logic and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.