Romulus Puşcaş

451 citations
33 papers · 355 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Romulus Puşcaş

31 papers receiving 347 citations

Peers

Romulus Puşcaş
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Analytical Chemistry 94
  • Animal Science and Zoology 76
  • Ecology 156
  • Insect Science 55
  • Food Science 76
Replace Gabriela Cristea with:
Gabriela Cristea Romania
Ana I. Cabañero Spain
Kiri McComb New Zealand
G. Casiello Italy
G. van der Veer Netherlands
Haiying Luo China
Haiyan Zhao China
Mauro Paolini Italy
Baohui Jin China
Diana Costinel Romania
Romulus Puşcaş relative to Gabriela Cristea Romania Gabriela Cristea's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Gabriela Cristea · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Romulus Puşcaş

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Romulus Puşcaş's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Romulus Puşcaş with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Romulus Puşcaş more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Romulus Puşcaş

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Romulus Puşcaş. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Romulus Puşcaş. The network helps show where Romulus Puşcaş may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Romulus Puşcaş, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Romulus Puşcaş Line = papers co-authored together Romulus Puşcaş links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202057
2 201734
3 201733
4 201228
5 201127
6 201625
7 202219
8 202115
9 202014
10 201714
11 202212
12 201110
13
THE USE OF ISOTOPE RATIOS IN COMMERCIAL FRUIT JUICES AUTHENTICATION
20149
14 20178
15 20207
16 20237
17 20136
18 20155
19 20184
20 20223

About Romulus Puşcaş

Romulus Puşcaş is a scholar working on Ecology, Animal Science and Zoology, Analytical Chemistry, Atmospheric Science and Food Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Isotope Analysis in Ecology (24 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (10 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (5 papers), Bee Products Chemical Analysis (5 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (5 papers), Heavy Metals in Plants (4 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (94 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (76 citations), Ecology (156 citations), Insect Science (55 citations) and Food Science (76 citations). Romulus Puşcaş has collaborated with scholars based in Romania and France. Frequent co-authors include Dana Alina Măgdaş, Gabriela Cristea, Ioana Feher, Adriana Dehelean, Olivian Marincaş, Cezara Voica, F. Guyon, Sorin Daniel Dan, Nicoleta Vedeanu and Arjen Bot. Their work appears in journals such as Analytical Letters, Applied Sciences, Food Chemistry, Foods and Meat Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact