Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.
19652.3k citationsDonald F. Roy, Robert L. Kahn et al.American Sociological Reviewprofile →
Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.
19651.4k citationsRobert L. Kahn, Donald M. Wolfe et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert P. Quinn
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert P. Quinn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert P. Quinn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert P. Quinn more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert P. Quinn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert P. Quinn. The network helps show where Robert P. Quinn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert P. Quinn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert P. Quinn.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert P. Quinn based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert P. Quinn. Robert P. Quinn is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Quinn, Robert P. & Graham L. Staines. (1979). The 1977 quality of employment survey : descriptive statistics, with comparison data from the 1969-70 and the 1972-73 surveys. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).131 indexed citations
7.
Staines, Graham L. & Robert P. Quinn. (1979). American Workers Evaluate the Quality of Their Jobs.. Monthly labor review. 102(1). 3–12.65 indexed citations
Quinn, Robert P.. (1975). Overeducation and Jobs: Can the Great Training Robbery be Stopped?..1 indexed citations
13.
Quinn, Robert P., et al.. (1974). The 1972-73 quality of employment survey : descriptive statistics, with comparison data from the 1969-70 survey of working conditions : report to the Employment Standards Administration, U.S. Department of Labor. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew).2 indexed citations
14.
Quinn, Robert P., et al.. (1974). The 1972-73 quality of employment survey: Descriptive statistics, with comparison data from the 1969-70 survey of working conditions.. Deep Blue (University of Michigan).125 indexed citations
15.
Quinn, Robert P., et al.. (1971). The Working Conditions Survey as a Source of Social Indicators.. Monthly labor review.5 indexed citations
Quinn, Robert P.. (1968). The Chosen few : a study of discrimination in executive selection.4 indexed citations
19.
Quinn, Robert P., et al.. (1968). The decision to discriminate : a study of executive selection. Medical Entomology and Zoology.15 indexed citations
20.
Roy, Donald F., Robert L. Kahn, Donald M. Wolfe, et al.. (1965). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.. American Sociological Review. 30(4). 620–620.2300 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.