Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.
19652.3k citationsDonald F. Roy, Robert L. Kahn et al.American Sociological Reviewprofile →
Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.
19651.4k citationsHarry Levinson, Robert L. Kahn et al.Administrative Science Quarterlyprofile →
Husbands and Wives, the Dynamics of Married Living
1961694 citationsMarvin J. Taves, Robert O. Blood et al.Marriage and Family Livingprofile →
An experimental investigation of need for cognition.
1955333 citationsArthur R. Cohen, Ezra Stotland et al.Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Donald M. Wolfe
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Donald M. Wolfe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Donald M. Wolfe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Donald M. Wolfe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Donald M. Wolfe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Donald M. Wolfe. The network helps show where Donald M. Wolfe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Donald M. Wolfe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Donald M. Wolfe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Donald M. Wolfe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Donald M. Wolfe. Donald M. Wolfe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Roy, Donald F., Robert L. Kahn, Donald M. Wolfe, et al.. (1965). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.. American Sociological Review. 30(4). 620–620.2300 indexed citations breakdown →
13.
Levinson, Harry, Robert L. Kahn, Donald M. Wolfe, et al.. (1965). Organizational Stress: Studies in Role Conflict and Ambiguity.. Administrative Science Quarterly. 10(1). 125–125.1431 indexed citations breakdown →
Taves, Marvin J., Robert O. Blood, & Donald M. Wolfe. (1961). Husbands and Wives, the Dynamics of Married Living. Marriage and Family Living. 23(2). 213–213.694 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Blood, Robert O. & Donald M. Wolfe. (1960). Husbands & wives : the dynamics of married living. American Journal of Sociology. 100(5).88 indexed citations
18.
Blood, Robert O. & Donald M. Wolfe. (1960). Husbands and wives: The dynamics of family living..78 indexed citations
Cohen, Arthur R., Ezra Stotland, & Donald M. Wolfe. (1955). An experimental investigation of need for cognition.. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. 51(2). 291–294.333 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.