Robert Most

3.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Robert Most is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert Most has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Social Psychology, 2 papers in Applied Psychology and 1 paper in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Robert Most's work include Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper). Robert Most is often cited by papers focused on Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (1 paper), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (1 paper) and Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper). Robert Most collaborates with scholars based in United States. Robert Most's co-authors include Mary H. McCaulley, Isabel Briggs Myers, Moshe Zeidner, Eli Saltz, Lorraine D. Eyde, Kevin L. Moreland, Gary J. Robertson and Jeffrey P. Prince and has published in prestigious journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Robert Most

7 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator

1985 2.0k citations Isabel Briggs Myers, Mary H. McCaulley et al. Medical Entomology and Zoology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert Most United States	6	592	587	480	371	365	7	2.1k
Mary H. McCaulley United States	10	661 1.1×	664 1.1×	558 1.2×	450 1.2×	435 1.2×	17	2.4k
Isabel Briggs Myers	3	802 1.4×	743 1.3×	588 1.2×	538 1.5×	489 1.3×	3	2.8k
Ronald R. Schmeck United States	18	734 1.2×	990 1.7×	1.2k 2.5×	479 1.3×	574 1.6×	40	2.7k
Dave Bartram United Kingdom	26	703 1.2×	286 0.5×	425 0.9×	457 1.2×	377 1.0×	80	2.5k
Fay Fransella United Kingdom	18	1.0k 1.7×	290 0.5×	232 0.5×	700 1.9×	191 0.5×	38	2.2k
D. Bannister United Kingdom	20	1.5k 2.6×	353 0.6×	255 0.5×	779 2.1×	260 0.7×	40	2.9k
H. van der Flier Netherlands	26	466 0.8×	213 0.4×	312 0.7×	271 0.7×	587 1.6×	74	2.1k
Donald A. Hantula United States	29	491 0.8×	573 1.0×	189 0.4×	254 0.7×	230 0.6×	90	2.5k
J. W. Getzels United States	23	449 0.8×	445 0.8×	676 1.4×	196 0.5×	1.7k 4.6×	67	3.0k
Harold F. O’Neil United States	32	492 0.8×	1.1k 1.8×	1.3k 2.7×	200 0.5×	589 1.6×	99	3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Robert Most

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Most's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Most with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Most more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert Most

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Most. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Most. The network helps show where Robert Most may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Most

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Most. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Most based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Most. Robert Most is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Prince, Jeffrey P., et al.. (2003). Self-Help Career Assessment: Ethical and Professional Issues. Journal of Career Assessment. 11(1). 40–58. 3 indexed citations

2.

Moreland, Kevin L., et al.. (1995). Assessment of test user qualifications: A research-based measurement procedure.. American Psychologist. 50(1). 14–23. 23 indexed citations

3.

Zeidner, Moshe & Robert Most. (1992). Psychological Testing: An Inside View. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 25 indexed citations

4.

Most, Robert. (1987). Levels of Error in Computerised Psychological Inventories. Applied Psychology. 36(3-4). 375–383. 6 indexed citations

5.

Myers, Isabel Briggs, Mary H. McCaulley, & Robert Most. (1985). Mbti Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-briggs Type Indicator. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 2014 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Most, Robert & Eli Saltz. (1979). Information Structure in Sentences: New Information. Language and Speech. 22(1). 89–95. 24 indexed citations

7.

Most, Robert, et al.. (1973). A comparison of stress measures in an experimental analogue of public speaking.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 41(3). 342–348. 12 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact