Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Essentials of Educational Measurement
19801.0k citationsAlfred D. Garvin, Robert L. EbelEducational Researcherprofile →
Estimation of the Reliability of Ratings
1951864 citationsRobert L. EbelPsychometrikaprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert L. Ebel
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert L. Ebel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert L. Ebel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert L. Ebel more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert L. Ebel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert L. Ebel. The network helps show where Robert L. Ebel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert L. Ebel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert L. Ebel.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert L. Ebel based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert L. Ebel. Robert L. Ebel is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1982). Three Radical Proposals for Strengthening Education.. Phi Delta Kappan. 63(6).1 indexed citations
3.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1982). Selective Admission: Whether and How.. The College Board review.
4.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1980). The Failure of Schools without Failure.. Phi Delta Kappan. 61(6).6 indexed citations
5.
Garvin, Alfred D. & Robert L. Ebel. (1980). Essentials of Educational Measurement. Educational Researcher. 9(9). 21–21.1046 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1979). Intelligence: A Skeptical View.. Journal of research and development in education. 12(2). 14–21.2 indexed citations
Ebel, Robert L.. (1974). Marks and Marking Systems. IEEE Transactions on Education. 17(2). 76–92.21 indexed citations
13.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1972). What Are Schools for. Phi Delta Kappan.6 indexed citations
14.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1971). Command of Knowledge Should Be the Primary Objective of Education.. NEA today.
15.
Ebel, Robert L.. (1970). Using Tests to Improve Instruction.. Journal of Engineering Education.2 indexed citations
16.
Ebel, Robert L., et al.. (1969). Encyclopedia of educational research : a project of the American Educational Research Association. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).2 indexed citations
Mehrens, William A. & Robert L. Ebel. (1967). Principles of educational and psychological measurement : a book of selected readings.7 indexed citations
Ebel, Robert L.. (1951). Estimation of the Reliability of Ratings. Psychometrika. 16(4). 407–424.864 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.