Robert C. Haygood

628 total citations
26 papers, 483 citations indexed

About

Robert C. Haygood is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Robert C. Haygood has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 483 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Robert C. Haygood's work include Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers). Robert C. Haygood is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (6 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (2 papers). Robert C. Haygood collaborates with scholars based in United States and Norway. Robert C. Haygood's co-authors include Lyle E. Bourne, Kristina Woodard, Raymond W. Kulhavy, Michael Stevenson, William A. Stock, David Johnson, Steven P. Rogers, Thomas D. Kennedy, Harold D. Fishbein and Michael P. Verdi and has published in prestigious journals such as Psychological Review, The American Journal of Psychology and Journal of Advertising.

In The Last Decade

Robert C. Haygood

24 papers receiving 339 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Robert C. Haygood United States	10	177	164	109	66	59	26	483
I. M. Schlesinger Israel	12	200 1.1×	112 0.7×	144 1.3×	111 1.7×	35 0.6×	25	546
Kirk H. Smith United States	10	145 0.8×	126 0.8×	85 0.8×	72 1.1×	25 0.4×	24	353
John L. Santa United States	11	139 0.8×	79 0.5×	134 1.2×	201 3.0×	56 0.9×	29	417
Michal C. Clark United States	4	229 1.3×	127 0.8×	162 1.5×	206 3.1×	66 1.1×	11	543
Ralph Hoepfner United States	9	115 0.6×	45 0.3×	288 2.6×	104 1.6×	112 1.9×	33	581
Renée Elio Canada	11	210 1.2×	270 1.6×	107 1.0×	83 1.3×	45 0.8×	29	523
Ok-choon Park United States	10	237 1.3×	91 0.6×	119 1.1×	19 0.3×	194 3.3×	26	444
Hubert Tardieu France	11	190 1.1×	67 0.4×	116 1.1×	155 2.3×	45 0.8×	28	419
Nancy Cooke United States	6	90 0.5×	110 0.7×	75 0.7×	40 0.6×	39 0.7×	9	307
M. J. Billington United States	8	147 0.8×	50 0.3×	100 0.9×	116 1.8×	49 0.8×	13	339

Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Haygood

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Haygood's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Haygood with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Haygood more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Haygood

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Haygood. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Haygood. The network helps show where Robert C. Haygood may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Haygood

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Haygood. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Haygood based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Haygood. Robert C. Haygood is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Kulhavy, Raymond W., et al.. (1993). Using maps to remember text: an instructional analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 63(1). 161–169. 17 indexed citations

Kulhavy, Raymond W., William A. Stock, Kristina Woodard, & Robert C. Haygood. (1993). Comparing Elaboration and Dual Coding Theories: The Case of Maps and Text. The American Journal of Psychology. 106(4). 483–483. 26 indexed citations

Kennedy, Thomas D. & Robert C. Haygood. (1992). The Discrediting Effect in Eyewitness Testimony¹. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 22(1). 70–82. 7 indexed citations

Stock, William A., et al.. (1990). Directed forgetting and feedback in written instruction. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 28(6). 543–546. 1 indexed citations

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1985). Effects of Scheduling on Retention of Advertising Messages. Journal of Advertising. 14(2). 41–64. 28 indexed citations

Johnson, David & Robert C. Haygood. (1984). The Use of Secondary Tasks in Adaptive Training. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 26(1). 105–108. 5 indexed citations

Haygood, Robert C. & David Johnson. (1983). Focus shift and individual differences in the Sternberg memory-search task. Acta Psychologica. 53(2). 129–139. 5 indexed citations

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1973). Relevant redundancy in disjunctive concept learning. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society. 1(5). 335–336.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1970). Intradimensional variability and concept identification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 83(2, Pt.1). 216–219. 7 indexed citations

10.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1968). Effects of number of relevant dimensions in disjunctive concept learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 78(1). 169–171. 2 indexed citations

11.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1968). Effects of degree of category separation on semantic concept identification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 76(3, Pt.1). 356–359. 5 indexed citations

12.

Haygood, Robert C. & Michael Stevenson. (1967). Effects of Proportion of Positive Instances upon Concept Learning. Psychological Reports. 20(1). 179–182. 4 indexed citations

13.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1967). Effects of composition of the positive category on concept learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 74(2, Pt.1). 230–235. 17 indexed citations

14.

Haygood, Robert C. & Michael Stevenson. (1967). Effects of number of irrelevant dimensions in nonconjunctive concept learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 74(2, Pt.1). 302–304. 15 indexed citations

15.

Haygood, Robert C. & Lyle E. Bourne. (1965). Attribute- and rule-learning aspects of conceptual behavior.. Psychological Review. 72(3). 175–195. 219 indexed citations

16.

Haygood, Robert C. & Lyle E. Bourne. (1964). Forms of relevant stimulus redundancy in concept identification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 67(4). 392–397. 12 indexed citations

17.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1964). Link Analysis by Computer. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 6(1). 63–70. 8 indexed citations

18.

Bourne, Lyle E. & Robert C. Haygood. (1961). Supplementary Report: Effect of redundant relevant information upon the identification of concepts.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 61(3). 259–260. 10 indexed citations

19.

Haygood, Robert C., et al.. (1961). Operator Accuracy in Angle Measurement and Transfer. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 3(1). 29–35. 1 indexed citations

20.

Bourne, Lyle E. & Robert C. Haygood. (1960). Effects of intermittent reinforcement of an irrelevant dimension and task complexity upon concept identification.. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 60(6). 371–375. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact