Riya George

22 papers receiving 231 citations

Peers

Riya George
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Applied Psychology 31
  • Family Practice 7
  • Health 16
  • Clinical Psychology 35
  • Sociology and Political Science 73
Replace Sijing Shao with:
Sijing Shao United States
Katalin Ujhelyi Gomez United Kingdom
Jennifer Tsai United States
Stijn A.H. Friederichs Netherlands
Lucy A. Guarnera United States
Xiao-Ling Liao China
Jannatul Mawa Misti Bangladesh
Julia Anderson United States
Kalina Isela Martínez Martínez Mexico
Louise Humbert Canada
Riya George relative to Sijing Shao United States Sijing Shao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Sijing Shao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Riya George

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Riya George's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Riya George with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Riya George more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Riya George

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Riya George. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Riya George. The network helps show where Riya George may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Riya George, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Riya George Line = papers co-authored together Riya George links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018117
2 201526
3 202317
4 201916
5 202413
6 202210
7 20206
8 20234
9 20153
10 20233
11 20223
12 20143
13 20232
14 20232
15 20232
16 20251
17 20231
18 20201
19 20191
20 20211

About Riya George

Riya George is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental health and Family Practice, having authored 26 papers that have together received 234 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Empathy and Medical Education (5 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (5 papers), Cultural Competency in Health Care (4 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (3 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (3 papers), Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (31 citations), Family Practice (7 citations), Health (16 citations), Clinical Psychology (35 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (73 citations). Riya George has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Nisha Dogra, Paul Reilly, Michelle O’Reilly, Natasha Whiteman, Jason Hughes, Graham Thornicroft, Peter Pype, Megan E. L. Brown, Annie Cushing and Shuangyu Li. Their work appears in journals such as The Clinical Teacher, Medical Teacher, BMC Medical Education, Medical Education and Medical Humanities.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact